Kwame A Plus, a Ghanaian Member of Parliament and a prominent figure known for his outspoken nature, has publicly criticized the New Patriotic Party (NPP) for its behavior following its electoral defeat and the subsequent assumption of power by President John Dramani Mahama. A Plus accuses the NPP of hypocrisy, highlighting their newfound outspokenness and criticism of the current administration, a stark contrast to their perceived silence during their own tenure. He argues that the NPP’s current vociferousness underscores a double standard, suggesting they stifled dissent while in power but are now quick to criticize the very actions they may have overlooked or even perpetuated. This perceived shift in behavior has drawn A Plus’s ire, prompting him to question the NPP’s credibility and motives.
Central to A Plus’s criticism is the contrast he draws between the NPP’s conduct while in power and their current behavior in opposition. He alleges that the NPP suppressed dissenting voices during their time in office, effectively silencing criticism and creating an environment of fear. Now, under President Mahama’s leadership, the NPP has become markedly more critical, publicly airing grievances and challenging government policies, a freedom they seemingly denied others during their own tenure. This perceived inconsistency forms the core of A Plus’s argument, painting the NPP as opportunistic and lacking in principle. He suggests that their criticisms are driven more by political expediency than genuine concern for the nation’s well-being.
Furthermore, A Plus underscores the NPP’s apparent intolerance for criticism while they held the reins of power. He cites the example of Bullgod, an individual who faced arrest for speaking out against the NPP government, highlighting the party’s perceived heavy-handedness in dealing with dissent. This incident, according to A Plus, stands in stark contrast to President Mahama’s approach, which he characterizes as more open to investigation and dialogue in the face of allegations. This comparison serves to further emphasize the perceived double standard in the NPP’s behavior, portraying them as intolerant while in power and overly critical while in opposition.
In expressing his frustration, A Plus draws a parallel between the NPP’s behavior and the leadership style of the Asantehene, Otumfuo Osei Tutu II, whom he commends for his wisdom and ability to maintain peace and unity within the Ashanti Kingdom. He praises the Asantehene for his careful and measured pronouncements, particularly during the Akufo-Addo administration, suggesting that the NPP could learn from the king’s judicious approach. By juxtaposing the Asantehene’s measured approach with the NPP’s perceived impulsiveness, A Plus implicitly criticizes the party’s conduct, suggesting a lack of maturity and foresight in their political pronouncements.
A Plus’s critique extends beyond mere observation of the NPP’s behavior; it delves into the potential implications of such conduct for the Ghanaian political landscape. He argues that the NPP’s actions erode public trust and undermine the credibility of their critiques. By highlighting their perceived hypocrisy, he suggests that their criticisms should be viewed with skepticism, potentially diminishing their impact on public discourse. This, according to A Plus, is detrimental to the healthy functioning of democracy, as it fosters cynicism and discourages meaningful engagement with political issues.
In concluding his critique, A Plus expresses his deep-seated anger at the NPP’s post-power conduct, accusing them of acting as if they are the sole proprietors of the country. He challenges their perceived sense of entitlement and their seemingly unwavering belief in their own righteousness. This sense of indignation underscores A Plus’s frustration with the NPP’s behavior, which he views as not only hypocritical but also potentially damaging to the political fabric of Ghana. He implies that their actions contribute to a polarized environment and hinder constructive dialogue, ultimately hindering the nation’s progress.
