Residents of Anambra State, Nigeria, adhered to a sit-at-home order issued by a faction of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), even as the main IPOB leadership urged the populace to disregard it. The compliance led to a significant shutdown of economic and commercial activities across the region, notably in cities like Onitsha, Nnewi, Ekwulobia, and Awka. Major marketplaces, roads, law courts, schools, banks, and petrol stations were notably deserted on the specified days, showing a stark contrast to the efforts made by the main IPOB faction to encourage normal business operations.
On Monday, the situation prompted Anambra State Governor, Prof. Chukwuma Soludo, to visit Nkpor Market to gauge public activity. Expressing relief at seeing some street traders operating, he emphasized the importance of adhering to lawful pursuits and assured these traders of their safety. Despite this gesture, the prevailing sentiment was one of fear among the citizens, who hesitated to engage in usual commercial activities due to the threat of repercussions from those enforcing the sit-at-home order.
Communications disseminated over social media from the factional IPOB group informed residents about the sit-at-home directive and included threats against those who did not comply. This coercive communication strategy illustrated the power of non-state actors in influencing local behavior, which proved to be effective despite counter-calls from the legitimate IPOB leadership. Many locals interpreted this situation as a reflection of the government’s limited control over public security and the presence of fear instilled by potential violence.
Market leaders and participants noted that while the official directive allowed them to open their shops, the threat of violence persuaded them to refrain from doing so. A market leader in Onitsha mentioned that the atmosphere of fear driven by the factional group’s threats resulted in an absence of traders, with only a handful venturing out to remain visible. Citizens like John Okonkwo articulated the view that the ongoing sit-at-home order would only cease with the release of Nnamdi Kanu, the detained IPOB leader, signaling a pervasive belief that the political situation heavily influences everyday life.
The response from civil rights advocates highlighted concerns about government inaction against threats circulating in communities. Ebuka Ikem, a notable human rights activist, raised issues about the inability of authorities to trace the source of the threatening communications despite modern technology such as the National Identification Number (NIN), which could aid in identifying individuals behind such activities. Ikem criticized the authorities for allowing non-state actors to instill fear and enforce obedience among citizens.
Overall, the incident reflects a complex interplay between governance, grassroots activism, and public compliance in Anambra State. The resistance from some residents against the directive issued by the IPOB faction indicates a struggle for autonomy and the desire to engage in normal life despite the threats. Nevertheless, the prevailing atmosphere of fear and compliance demonstrates how power dynamics can influence societal behaviors, showcasing the significant impact of non-state actors in shaping public sentiment and actions within affected communities. The scenario further underscores the urgent need for stronger governmental measures to establish trust and security for citizens, as well as effective dialogue with dissenting groups.
