The Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Dr. Dominic Ayine, has vehemently refuted claims that President John Dramani Mahama is acting as a “clearing agent” for individuals previously accused of wrongdoing. This label emerged following Dr. Ayine’s decisions to discontinue several cases initiated by his predecessor, Godfred Yeboah Dame, against appointees of Mahama’s former administration. Dr. Ayine unequivocally asserted his sole responsibility for these decisions, emphasizing that President Mahama played no role whatsoever in the discontinuation of the cases. He called for a reevaluation of the “clearing agent” narrative, urging critics to recognize the independent nature of his office and the careful consideration that went into each decision.
Dr. Ayine detailed the rigorous process behind the discontinuation of the cases, highlighting the extensive consultations and meticulous file reviews undertaken prior to reaching a determination. He underscored the nuanced approach adopted, citing examples like the SSNIT and banking cases where charges were withdrawn against certain accused individuals while others remained under consideration. This approach, he explained, reflects a conscious effort to strike a balance between upholding public interest and protecting the rights of the accused persons. He firmly asserted his commitment to the principles of justice and fairness, assuring the public that each case was evaluated on its individual merits, free from external pressure or directives.
The Attorney-General categorically denied any influence from the President in his decision-making process. He reiterated his full accountability for all the decisions taken by his office, emphasizing that he operates independently and without instruction or pressure to discontinue or initiate any legal proceedings. This declaration aimed to dispel the notion of presidential interference and underscore the Attorney-General’s autonomous role in prosecuting cases. He urged those hastily labeling President Mahama a “clearing agent” to exercise caution and acknowledge the President’s non-involvement in prosecutorial decisions.
Furthermore, Dr. Ayine revealed that his office is currently reviewing the report submitted by the Operation Recover All Loot (ORAL) committee. This committee was tasked with investigating alleged instances of corruption and financial misconduct. The Attorney-General’s office, he assured, is committed to thoroughly examining the evidence gathered by the committee and pursuing appropriate legal action based on the findings. He stressed the importance of building strong, evidence-based cases before proceeding to court, signaling a commitment to due process and the pursuit of justice grounded in concrete proof.
Dr. Ayine’s comprehensive statement aimed to clarify the circumstances surrounding the discontinued cases and to definitively separate President Mahama from any involvement in the decisions. His emphasis on due process, careful consideration, and independent decision-making sought to reassure the public of the integrity of his office and its commitment to upholding the rule of law. The ongoing review of the ORAL committee report further underscores his dedication to combating corruption and holding those responsible accountable. This commitment to thorough investigation and the meticulous preparation of cases before court action highlights a measured approach to prosecution guided by the pursuit of justice.
By directly addressing the accusations and providing detailed explanations of his actions, Dr. Ayine sought to counter the narrative surrounding President Mahama’s alleged involvement. His assertion of independence and the meticulous process he described aim to rebuild public trust and underscore the commitment of his office to the fair and impartial administration of justice. The ongoing examination of the ORAL report reinforces his commitment to pursuing cases of corruption and holding wrongdoers accountable through legitimate legal channels.
