A Deep Dive into a Land Dispute in Ondo City: Accusations of Encroachment, Police Interference, and the Pursuit of Justice
The serene landscape of Ondo City, Nigeria, is currently the backdrop of a simmering land dispute, drawing attention to complex issues of property rights, alleged police misconduct, and the pursuit of justice within the Nigerian legal system. At the heart of the controversy lies a parcel of land co-owned by businessman Olufemi Fasehun, Orobola Fasehun, and the estate of the late Dr. Frederick Fasehun, founder of the Oodua People’s Congress. Olufemi Fasehun has lodged a formal petition with high-ranking legal and law enforcement officials, including the Inspector-General of Police, the Police Service Commission, and the Attorney-General of the Federation, alleging encroachment upon the jointly owned property.
The petition identifies Adewunmi Fasehun, Felix Fasehun, and Clara Ogunsanmi, also known as “Iya Eta,” as the individuals allegedly responsible for the encroachment. Fasehun’s complaint details the unauthorized access to portions of the land, resulting in the destruction of valuable economic trees, including palm trees. He further alleges that portions of the disputed property may have been sold under questionable ownership claims, prompting a public caution regarding land transactions involving the property while the investigation is ongoing. This raises serious concerns about potential fraud and the security of land ownership in the region.
Adding another layer of complexity to the dispute, Fasehun alleges interference in the investigation by officers at Zone 17 of the Nigeria Police Force in Akure. Specifically, he names DCP Sunny Dangana, CSP Kayode, and the OC Monitoring team as individuals whose actions have potentially compromised the impartiality of the investigation. Fasehun claims that initial progress made by the Ondo State Commissioner of Police was stalled after the case was transferred to Zone 17. This raises critical questions about due process, transparency, and potential undue influence within the police force.
Adding further weight to Fasehun’s concerns, the investigation’s trajectory took an unexpected turn when it was redirected from the Ondo State Police Command to Zone 17 in Akure. This shift coincided with an alleged slowdown in investigative progress, raising questions about potential interference or deliberate obstruction of justice. The petition highlights the urgency of a thorough and unbiased investigation, calling upon IGP Kayode Egbetokun to ensure the integrity of the process and urging the newly appointed AIG to uphold transparency and professionalism within Zone 17.
Meanwhile, in a parallel legal proceeding, the Ondo State High Court has intervened in the land dispute, ordering all parties to maintain the status quo pending the resolution of the case. This order, issued by Hon. Justice J.O. Abe in Suit No: HCOD/33/CIV/202, effectively freezes any further actions on the disputed property until the court reaches a final determination. The claimants, represented by legal counsel A.Y. Aliyu, were present in court. The defendants, however, were absent, prompting the court to issue hearing notices and adjourn the case to July 2, 2025. This judicial intervention emphasizes the importance of upholding legal processes and respecting court orders while the complex issues of ownership and alleged encroachment are investigated.
The ongoing land dispute in Ondo City has far-reaching implications, extending beyond the immediate concerns of the involved parties. It underscores the need for robust property rights protection, transparent and accountable law enforcement, and a functioning judicial system that ensures fair and timely resolution of disputes. The allegations of police interference raise serious questions about the integrity of the investigative process and the potential for undue influence, further underscoring the need for independent oversight and accountability within law enforcement agencies. As the case progresses through both legal and investigative channels, it will undoubtedly serve as a litmus test for the effectiveness of Nigeria’s justice system in addressing complex property disputes and holding those responsible for misconduct accountable. The public awaits the outcome with keen interest, hoping for a just resolution that upholds the rule of law and protects the rights of all parties involved.
