The courtroom drama unfolded on Wednesday, June 11, 2025, at the Tema High Court, as gospel singer Empress Gifty Adorye and evangelist Patricia Asiedua, popularly known as Nana Agradaa, faced each other in a GH¢20 million defamation lawsuit. The legal battle stemmed from a series of accusations leveled by Nana Agradaa against Empress Gifty, alleging that the gospel singer had engaged in extramarital affairs with various pastors and other men to fund her extravagant lifestyle. The courtroom atmosphere was thick with tension as the two prominent figures arrived, each accompanied by their respective spouses.
Nana Agradaa made a dramatic entrance, clad entirely in white, a symbolic gesture often associated with victory in Ghanaian culture. Her husband, Angel Asiamah, stood by her side as she displayed a defiant attitude, even going so far as to taunt Empress Gifty by shouting her signature catchphrases, “Noko fine, noko tantaliser,” in a mocking tone. This provocative behavior further underscored the deep-seated animosity between the two women. In contrast, Empress Gifty appeared more reserved, accompanied by her husband, Hopeson Adorye, as she prepared to confront the allegations head-on.
The genesis of this public feud can be traced back to a series of disparaging remarks made by Nana Agradaa about Empress Gifty on various social media platforms. These comments, which quickly gained traction online, accused the gospel singer of infidelity and painted a picture of her using illicit relationships to maintain her opulent lifestyle. The allegations, which Empress Gifty vehemently denies, caused significant damage to her reputation and public image, prompting her to seek legal redress. The GH¢20 million lawsuit represents a significant claim for damages, reflecting the perceived harm inflicted on Empress Gifty’s career and personal life.
Empress Gifty’s legal team outlined the specific reliefs sought in the lawsuit, which included not only the substantial monetary compensation but also a perpetual injunction to prevent Nana Agradaa from making any further defamatory statements against her. This legal measure aims to protect Empress Gifty from future reputational damage and ensure that Nana Agradaa is held accountable for her actions. Furthermore, the lawsuit demands that Nana Agradaa remove all existing defamatory content from her social media platforms, effectively purging the online space of the damaging allegations. This step is crucial in restoring Empress Gifty’s public image and mitigating the ongoing harm caused by the widespread dissemination of the accusations.
The court proceedings, however, hit an unexpected snag when Nana Agradaa’s legal representation failed to appear in court. This absence effectively stalled the hearing, preventing any substantial progress in the case. As a result, the judge was compelled to adjourn the proceedings to June 26, 2025, to allow Nana Agradaa’s lawyer the opportunity to attend and represent her client. This delay adds another layer of complexity to the already tense situation, prolonging the legal battle and leaving both parties in a state of uncertainty.
The adjournment underscores the importance of legal representation in such high-stakes cases. Without adequate legal counsel, defendants like Nana Agradaa risk facing significant legal consequences. The upcoming court date will be crucial in determining the trajectory of the case, as it will allow both sides to present their arguments and evidence. The outcome will have significant implications for both Empress Gifty and Nana Agradaa, shaping their public images and potentially setting a precedent for future defamation cases involving public figures in Ghana. The public awaits the next hearing with bated breath, eager to witness the unfolding of this dramatic legal battle.
