Nasir El-Rufai, the former governor of Kaduna State, has launched a scathing critique of the Nigerian judiciary, alleging widespread corruption and a decline in public trust. In a speech delivered during the Nigerian Bar Association’s Law Week in Abuja, El-Rufai argued that the judiciary, instead of being a bastion of fairness and order, has become riddled with delays, inefficiencies, and compromised integrity. He pointed to a growing perception that justice is a commodity accessible primarily to the wealthy and influential, while ordinary citizens are left grappling with a system that often fails to deliver equitable outcomes. This erosion of public trust, according to El-Rufai, stems from the judiciary’s perceived susceptibility to external pressures and its tendency to prioritize legal processes over the pursuit of genuine justice.
El-Rufai’s accusations extended beyond general criticisms of the judiciary’s performance. He specifically condemned the increasing prevalence of ex parte orders in political disputes, alleging that some legal practitioners manipulate the court system to gain political advantages. This “weaponization” of ex parte orders, often granted without hearing from the opposing party, contributes to the perception that the judiciary is being used as a tool for political maneuvering rather than a neutral arbiter of disputes. He further lamented the practice of “forum shopping,” where litigants strategically choose courts they believe will be more favorable to their case, further undermining the integrity and impartiality of the judicial process.
The former governor also highlighted the growing chasm between legal procedures and the attainment of actual justice in Nigeria. He argued that the pursuit of legal technicalities often overshadows the fundamental principles of fairness and equity, leaving many with a sense that the law is being applied selectively and inconsistently. This disconnect between law and justice, El-Rufai contended, has created an environment where the judiciary appears to be subservient to the executive branch of government, eroding its independence and further diminishing public trust.
El-Rufai called for a deep introspection within the legal profession, urging lawyers to critically examine their roles and recommit themselves to upholding impartial justice. He challenged the legal community to address the systemic issues that have plagued the judiciary, including delays, inefficiencies, and the perception of bias. He emphasized the need for a renewed focus on the core principles of fairness, equity, and access to justice for all, regardless of their social or economic standing.
El-Rufai’s pronouncements represent a significant indictment of the Nigerian judiciary, coming from a prominent figure with extensive experience in the political and governmental landscape. His criticisms touch upon long-standing concerns about the effectiveness and impartiality of the Nigerian legal system, raising questions about the extent to which the judiciary is fulfilling its constitutional mandate. His emphasis on the need for greater transparency, accountability, and adherence to ethical principles underscores the importance of judicial reform in strengthening the rule of law and restoring public confidence in the justice system.
El-Rufai’s call for introspection within the legal profession underscores the crucial role of lawyers in upholding the integrity of the judicial system. He essentially challenged legal practitioners to confront the uncomfortable realities within their profession and work towards meaningful reforms. This includes actively combating the misuse of legal procedures for political gain and advocating for greater access to justice for all citizens. The future of the Nigerian judiciary, El-Rufai implied, hinges on the willingness of legal professionals to embrace ethical practices and champion the principles of fairness and justice that are foundational to a democratic society.
