Nasir El-Rufai, former governor of Kaduna State and a prominent figure in Nigerian politics, has launched a scathing critique of President Bola Tinubu’s cabinet, characterizing it as a “joke” and a “tragedy” for Nigeria. El-Rufai’s disappointment stems from what he perceives as a significant departure from the technocratic and inclusive governance model Tinubu implemented during his tenure as governor of Lagos State. He contrasts the current cabinet with the high-caliber individuals who served during his time as a minister, citing examples like Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and Oby Ezekwesili, and lamenting the apparent absence of similar competence in the current administration. This perceived lack of quality, according to El-Rufai, is a critical flaw that undermines the government’s ability to effectively address the nation’s complex challenges.
El-Rufai’s criticism goes beyond simply pointing out perceived shortcomings; it delves into a sense of personal responsibility for the current situation. He admits his own complicity in what he calls a “tragedy,” acknowledging that his support for Tinubu during the 2023 elections was predicated on the belief that Tinubu would replicate his Lagos success on a national scale. This expectation, he now feels, has been betrayed. El-Rufai contrasts Tinubu’s inclusive Lagos administration, which incorporated professionals from diverse backgrounds and expertise, with what he perceives as a bloated and underperforming current cabinet. This contrast fuels his sense of urgency to rectify what he sees as a grave misstep with potentially devastating consequences for the country.
The former governor’s critique is further underscored by a sense of impending crisis. He expresses a deep concern for the future of Nigeria if the current trajectory remains unchecked, warning of potential destruction if the perceived inadequacies of the government are not addressed. This dire prediction emphasizes the seriousness of his accusations and highlights his belief that the current administration is not only failing to meet expectations but is actively jeopardizing the nation’s well-being. El-Rufai’s age and impending retirement add another layer to his critique. He portrays himself as someone who could comfortably step away from the political scene but feels a moral obligation to speak out and attempt to correct what he sees as a dangerous course for the nation.
El-Rufai’s critique also provides insight into the complex dynamics within the ruling party. He reveals that his relationship with Tinubu has never been particularly close, attributing the distance to his allegiance to former President Muhammadu Buhari. He describes himself as a “Buhari boy” within the party, contrasting himself with Tinubu’s own loyalists. This distinction, he suggests, contributed to a certain degree of animosity from Tinubu. Despite this strained relationship, El-Rufai emphasizes his commitment to the party, highlighting his efforts to secure victory for Tinubu in Kaduna State during the elections. This action, he explains, was driven by a sense of duty to the party, overriding his personal feelings about Tinubu.
The revelation of this less-than-cordial relationship adds another dimension to El-Rufai’s criticism. It suggests that his assessment of the Tinubu administration is not driven by personal animosity or political maneuvering but stems from a genuine concern for the country’s well-being. His willingness to publicly criticize a president from his own party, despite their strained relationship, lends credibility to his claims and underscores the depth of his concern. It portrays him as someone willing to prioritize national interests over party loyalty and personal relationships.
In essence, El-Rufai’s critique is a multi-layered commentary on the current political landscape in Nigeria. It is a sharp rebuke of the president’s cabinet, a confession of personal disappointment and responsibility, a dire warning about the nation’s future, and a glimpse into the internal dynamics of the ruling party. His words carry weight not just because of his political stature but also because of his willingness to publicly challenge the status quo, even within his own political camp. His outspokenness, combined with the specific examples and arguments he presents, paints a concerning picture of the current administration and raises serious questions about its ability to navigate the complex challenges facing Nigeria.
