Controversial Ghanaian prophet, Kumchacha, has recently made headlines with his audacious recommendation for Ghanaians to vote for John Mahama, the flagbearer of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), in the upcoming elections. In a revealing interview on Onua FM, Kumchacha asserted that aligning with the NDC is synonymous with spiritual favor, suggesting that divine backing rests squarely with Mahama and his party. He implied that a vote for the NDC would not only secure a better governance option but also serve as a pathway to heaven for the electorate. This provocative stance has reignited debates about the intersection of religion and politics in Ghana, where leaders often reference spiritual or moral imperatives when endorsing candidates.
Kumchacha’s critique of the current president, Nana Akufo-Addo, reflects his deep dissatisfaction with the present government’s leadership. He characterized Akufo-Addo’s style as “disgusting”, particularly condemning the allocation of substantial funds—$58 million—toward the construction of the National Cathedral. He derided the church project, suggesting that it has devolved into a “swimming pool,” a metaphor indicating mismanagement and misplaced priorities. This commentary highlights a broader critique by some Ghanaians who perceive the current administration’s focus on grandiose projects rather than pressing socioeconomic issues as a significant flaw in governance.
In terms of economic performance, Kumchacha drew stark comparisons between Mahama’s presidency and that of Akufo-Addo. He highlighted that during Mahama’s tenure, the Ghanaian cedi was more stable against the US dollar, trading at GH¢4 for $1, in stark contrast to the current rate of GH¢17 under the New Patriotic Party (NPP) government. Additionally, Kumchacha emphasized the dramatic increase in fuel prices, noting that petrol was sold for GH¢15 per liter during Mahama’s administration, whereas it has escalated to GH¢60 per liter under the current president. These financial statistics aim to paint a bleak picture of the current economic landscape, suggesting a regression in fiscal management.
Kumchacha’s endorsement of Mahama is not solely based on economic metrics; it also reflects a belief that a return to NDC governance would restore a sense of stability and progress to the country. He expressed a clear preference for Mahama’s leadership, stating he would choose it “any day” over the current leadership. This sentiment underscores broader worries among some Ghanaians who feel that the country has not fared well under the NPP. The prophet’s declarations resonate with those disillusioned by recent economic hardships and governance challenges, potentially bolstering Mahama’s support base as elections approach.
His concluding remarks in the interview were particularly stirring, advising voters directly that choosing Mahama is essentially a choice for heavenly favor. “So, if you want to go to heaven, vote for John Mahama on the 7th of December,” he stated emphatically. With this assertion, Kumchacha positions the electoral decision not merely as a political act, but as a moral one with eternal consequences. This framing likely aims to galvanize religious sentiments among the electorate, appealing to those who view their voting choices as deeply intertwined with their spiritual beliefs.
Kumchacha’s statements have sparked discussions across various platforms regarding the role of religious figures in political endorsement and the implications of such affiliations. As a controversial man of God, his proclamations could wield significant influence among certain voter demographics who regard prophets as moral authorities. This incident has reignited conversations around not just politics, but the intertwining of belief systems with electoral choices in Ghana, raising questions about the responsibilities of religious leaders in political discourse and the delicate balance between faith and governance in the democratic space.
