Paragraph 1: The Petition and the Claim of Rightful Installation
The Aboradze Royal Family of Gomoa Ekwamkrom, Central Region, Ghana, has lodged a formal petition with the Central Regional House of Chiefs, challenging a judgment against their installed chief, Nana Dr. Okogyeaman Awuahaa II. The family asserts that the judgment, overseen by Osagyefo Amanfo Edu VI, Omanhene of Mankessim, is biased and disregards the legitimate installation of their chief. They maintain that Nana Dr. Okogyeaman Awuahaa II was chosen according to customary law and tradition, following a rotational system within the Awuahaa Royal Gate. This process, they argue, makes him the rightful successor following the resignation of the previous chief.
Paragraph 2: Traditional Protocols and Gazetting
The Aboradze Royal Family emphasizes that the installation of Nana Dr. Okogyeaman Awuahaa II adhered strictly to established customs and traditions. All necessary rituals were performed, and the newly installed chief was subsequently presented to Omanhene Obrempong Nyanful Krampah XI of the Gomoa Ajumako Traditional Area and the Traditional Council. He swore the Oath of Allegiance, formalizing his position as the chief of Gomoa Ekwamkrom. Crucially, he has since been gazetted, officially recognized by the government as the substantive chief of Gomoa Ekwamkrom in the Gomoa Central District of the Central Region.
Paragraph 3: Questioning the Mankessim Omanhene’s Involvement
The petition raises concerns about the involvement of Osagyefo Amanfo Edu VI, the Omanhene of Mankessim, in this matter. The Aboradze Royal Family questions his authority to challenge the installation of their chief, particularly given that the process was overseen and approved by the Omanhene of Gomoa Ajumako and the Traditional Council. They argue that the Mankessim Omanhene’s actions effectively discredit Obrempong Nyanful Krampah XI and the Gomoa Ajumako Traditional Council, undermining their authority and traditional processes.
Paragraph 4: Procedural Concerns and Perceived Bias
The petitioners further highlight what they perceive as procedural irregularities and bias in the judgment against their chief. They question why Obrempong Nyanful Krampah XI, the Omanhene who oversaw the installation, was not called to testify before the Regional House of Chiefs. The petition suggests that Osagyefo Amanfo Edu VI took a personal interest in the case, leading to a judgment that appears predetermined and unfair. This perceived lack of due process further strengthens the family’s claim of a biased judgment.
Paragraph 5: A Call for Non-Interference and Focus on Local Issues
The Aboradze Royal Family, through their spokesperson, Nana Osaberima Kow Botwe I, has issued a strong warning to the Omanhene of Mankessim to refrain from interfering in their internal affairs. They urge him to concentrate on resolving the pressing issues within his own jurisdiction, particularly the chieftaincy disputes in Mankessim, which have escalated to violence and loss of life. They emphasize the peaceful nature of Gomoa Ekwamkrom and their desire to maintain stability within their community.
Paragraph 6: Reaffirming the Legitimate Chief and Call for Order
Ebusuapanyin Griffin, another representative of the Aboradze Royal Family, further supports the petition’s claims. He stresses that Gomoa Ekwamkrom already has a legitimate chief in Nana Dr. Okogyeaman Awuahaa II, who is actively involved in the community’s development. He calls upon the Central Regional House of Chiefs to intervene and admonish Osagyefo Amanfo Edu VI and his team, urging them to respect the established traditional processes and the authority of the Gomoa Ajumako Traditional Council in this matter. The family expects the House of Chiefs to uphold the rightful installation of their chief and safeguard the peace and stability of Gomoa Ekwamkrom.
