The potential removal of Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Dr. George Akuffo Dampare has sparked controversy and debate, particularly regarding the delicate balance between political considerations and the need for maintaining professionalism and stability within critical institutions. Franklin Cudjoe, Founding President of IMANI Africa, a prominent think tank in Ghana, has voiced strong concerns against any such move, urging President John Mahama to prioritize professionalism over partisan interests. Cudjoe’s argument centers on the demonstrable achievements of Dr. Dampare, who has risen through the ranks and implemented significant reforms within the police force. Removing such a figure without clear and justifiable reasons, especially when considering his positive impact on national security and his resilience against internal and external pressures, would send a detrimental signal about the value of competence and integrity in public service.
Cudjoe’s cautionary stance reflects a broader anxiety about the potential politicization of key institutions, a concern that transcends specific individuals and touches upon the fundamental principles of good governance. The fear is that removing a successful and respected figure like Dr. Dampare based on political expediency could undermine public trust in the police force and create an environment where appointments are driven by partisan loyalty rather than merit. This, in turn, could destabilize the institution and erode its effectiveness in maintaining law and order, a critical component of any functioning democracy. The emphasis on “keeping good men” when they are found speaks to the importance of valuing and protecting capable leaders who are committed to serving the public interest, regardless of political affiliations.
Kofi Bentil, Vice President of IMANI Africa, echoed Cudjoe’s sentiments, drawing parallels to past instances where political considerations appeared to override due process and institutional independence. He specifically referenced the dismissal of former Auditor-General Daniel Domelevo, which was widely criticized as politically motivated. Bentil’s warning against repeating such “mistakes” highlights the need for consistency in upholding the rule of law and respecting the independence of key institutions. While acknowledging President Mahama’s prerogative to make appointments, Bentil stressed the importance of adhering to legal procedures and avoiding actions that could be perceived as undermining the integrity of the process. He urged the President to wait for the Supreme Court ruling, emphasizing the importance of respecting judicial processes and avoiding any appearance of preempting or influencing legal outcomes.
The call for a “reset” in Ghana’s political landscape further underscores the desire for a departure from practices that prioritize political expediency over good governance principles. The concern is that repeating past errors, particularly those related to the politicization of key institutions, would not only undermine public trust but also hinder the country’s progress and development. The emphasis on avoiding a “worst form” of these past actions highlights the potential for further deterioration if political maneuvering continues to overshadow the need for competent and impartial leadership within crucial state institutions. This call for a reset reflects a broader yearning for a more mature and principled approach to governance, one that prioritizes the long-term interests of the nation over short-term political gains.
Dr. Dampare’s remaining tenure of five years before mandatory retirement adds another layer to the debate. His continued service would provide stability and continuity within the police force, allowing him to further implement his reforms and consolidate the progress made during his tenure. Removing him before his term expires would raise questions about the motivations behind such a decision, particularly if no credible reasons are provided. This could be interpreted as a politically motivated move, further fueling concerns about the politicization of the police force and potentially destabilizing the institution. Conversely, allowing Dr. Dampare to complete his term would send a strong message about the government’s commitment to stability, professionalism, and respect for institutional integrity.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding the potential removal of IGP Dr. George Akuffo Dampare highlights the tension between political considerations and the imperative of maintaining professionalism and independence within critical institutions. The concerns raised by civil society organizations like IMANI Africa underscore the potential risks associated with prioritizing political expediency over merit and due process. The call for a “reset” in Ghana’s political landscape reflects a broader desire for a more ethical and transparent approach to governance, one that prioritizes the long-term interests of the nation and strengthens democratic institutions. The ultimate decision regarding Dr. Dampare’s future will be a crucial test of the government’s commitment to these principles and its willingness to prioritize the long-term stability and well-being of the nation over short-term political calculations.
