Alhaji Said Sinare, Ghana’s former ambassador and a prominent figure within the National Democratic Congress (NDC), launched a blistering critique of the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP), characterizing them as a disoriented and fragmented entity incapable of providing effective leadership. He contrasted this with the purportedly visionary leadership of President John Dramani Mahama, whom he lauded as a champion of pragmatic and citizen-centric governance. Sinare’s statement, which quickly ignited political debate, asserted that President Mahama was not merely managing the economic challenges inherited from the NPP’s tenure but actively restoring hope, fostering national unity, and steering Ghana towards a comprehensive recovery. He dismissed the NPP as a purveyor of outdated propaganda, entangled in internal power struggles, and ultimately offering only disarray.
Sinare highlighted what he considered key achievements of the Mahama administration, including efforts to curb inflation, stabilize the national currency, and unify a politically divided nation. He presented these accomplishments as evidence of President Mahama’s focused and efficacious leadership. Furthermore, Sinare praised the “Accounting to the People” initiative as a testament to the President’s commitment to transparency and public engagement, contrasting it with the NPP’s alleged lack of accountability.
The former ambassador drew a stark comparison between the leadership styles of the NDC and the NPP, accusing the previous NPP administration of practicing nepotism within the Presidency. He argued that while the NPP had allegedly transformed the seat of government into a hub for family and friends, President Mahama had prioritized competence in his appointments. This, according to Sinare, reflected a fundamental difference in the two parties’ approaches to governance and their commitment to serving the interests of the Ghanaian people.
Sinare’s critique of the NPP extended to their internal dynamics, portraying the party as teetering on the brink of collapse. He accused the NPP of operating like a dysfunctional entity plagued by infighting, mistrust among its leaders, and an inability to acknowledge its own shortcomings, including a refusal to release its 2024 Election Report. He further alleged that disillusionment was rife within the NPP’s ranks, with leaks, internal sabotage, and ego-driven conflicts becoming commonplace. He dismissed any attempts at rebranding by the NPP as deceptive, asserting that the Ghanaian public has moved on from their previous governance.
As the Chairman of the NDC’s Zongo Caucus Working Committee, Sinare concluded his statement with a fervent call to action, urging Ghanaians to rally behind President Mahama and the NDC. He presented the NDC under Mahama as the only viable path forward for Ghana, claiming that a return to NPP rule would inevitably lead to a resurgence of dysfunction. He expressed confidence in the NDC’s momentum and the public’s recognition of the party’s commitment to their welfare.
Sinare’s statement serves as a powerful example of political rhetoric employed to champion one party while discrediting the opposition. He constructs a narrative that positions the NDC as the party of progress and unity, while depicting the NPP as a chaotic and self-serving entity. By highlighting perceived successes of the Mahama administration and contrasting them with alleged failures of the NPP, Sinare aims to bolster support for the NDC and influence public opinion ahead of future elections. His strong language and accusations are characteristic of political discourse aimed at mobilizing support and solidifying party loyalty. Whether these claims resonate with the broader electorate remains to be seen.
