Paragraph 1: Internal Conflict and Disciplinary Action within the Institute of Safety Professionals of Nigeria
The Institute of Safety Professionals of Nigeria (ISPON) has found itself embroiled in internal conflict, leading to the dismissal of three members for alleged misconduct and indiscipline. This disciplinary action, confirmed by ISPON President Dr. Stephen Udezi, follows a thorough investigation by the Governing Board and adheres to the institute’s established act. The dismissed members, identified as Timothy Iwuagwu, Mrs. Esther Williams, and Olayinka Fatunsi, are accused of fueling discord within the organization and falsely presenting themselves as Governing Executives. Their dismissal is a significant step taken by ISPON to address the ongoing internal strife and maintain professional conduct among its members.
Paragraph 2: Allegations of False Representation and Disputed Leadership
The core issue at the heart of this conflict revolves around a disputed leadership election. Dr. Udezi asserts that he and ten other governing members were duly elected during ISPON’s Annual General Meeting and Professional Development Conference in Abuja. However, Mr. Iwuagwu, one of the dismissed members, allegedly claims to be the legitimate president of the institute, despite losing the election overseen by the House Committee on Safety Standards and Regulations. This contested election, held between October 17 and 19, 2024, has become a source of contention and division within ISPON. Dr. Udezi has challenged Mr. Iwuagwu to produce evidence supporting his claim, suggesting potential legal action against him for misleading the public.
Paragraph 3: National Assembly’s Intervention and the Unification Effort
The protracted crisis within ISPON prompted the intervention of the National Assembly, which sought to mediate and reconcile the conflicting factions. Representatives from different groups, including Dr. Udezi and Mr. Iwuagwu, engaged in discussions at the National Assembly, ultimately agreeing to pursue peace and unity. A caretaker committee comprising twelve members, four from each faction, was formed under the leadership of Hon. Harrison, Vice Chairman of the House Committee on Safety Standards and Regulations. This intervention aimed to create a pathway towards resolving the internal disputes and establishing a unified ISPON.
Paragraph 4: The Contested Election and its Aftermath
The National Assembly-mediated election became the focal point of the unification efforts. Three candidates contested the presidency, and Dr. Udezi emerged victorious, receiving a Certificate of Return. This election, conducted under the oversight of the National Assembly, was intended to legitimize the leadership and pave the way for a unified ISPON. However, Mr. Iwuagwu’s refusal to accept the outcome has further fueled the internal conflict, leading to his dismissal and the dismissal of two other members accused of supporting his claims.
Paragraph 5: Institute’s Stance and Potential Legal Recourse
ISPON’s leadership, under Dr. Udezi, maintains that the disciplinary actions taken against the three members are justified and necessary to maintain order and professional conduct within the institute. The dismissed members can be reinstated only if they formally apologize to the body and acknowledge the legitimacy of the elected leadership. Furthermore, Dr. Udezi has indicated that ISPON is prepared to pursue legal action against Mr. Iwuagwu if he continues to misrepresent himself as the institute’s president. This firm stance underscores ISPON’s commitment to resolving the internal conflict and upholding its professional integrity.
Paragraph 6: Seeking Response from the Dismissed Member
Attempts to obtain a response from Mr. Iwuagwu regarding the allegations and his dismissal have been met with conditions. He insisted on a face-to-face meeting with the correspondent, citing his unavailability for a week due to travel. The correspondent agreed to this arrangement, leaving the possibility of obtaining Mr. Iwuagwu’s perspective on the situation open for the future. This pending response is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the ongoing conflict within ISPON and the differing narratives surrounding the disputed leadership.
