The ongoing feud between Ghanaian Afrobeats artists Kelvyn Boy and Stonebwoy has reignited, with Kelvyn Boy publicly accusing his former mentor of employing defamatory tactics and “mafia” strategies to sabotage his career. In a raw and emotional social media post, Kelvyn Boy vented his frustrations, alleging that Stonebwoy’s actions have significantly hampered his progress and tarnished his reputation within the Ghanaian music industry. He questioned the motive behind Stonebwoy’s alleged campaign against him, expressing the feeling of being unfairly targeted and portrayed as the villain in their narrative. This latest outburst follows recent remarks by Stonebwoy characterizing Kelvyn Boy’s past behavior as “dangerous and deadly,” suggesting a divine intervention saved him from harm. The lingering animosity underscores the unresolved tensions stemming from their professional split.
Kelvyn Boy’s accusations paint a picture of systematic undermining by Stonebwoy, influencing public opinion against him and creating roadblocks to his career advancement. He lamented the perceived impact on his potential, suggesting he hasn’t been able to reach the heights he believes he could have attained, largely due to what he calls Stonebwoy’s “mafia tactics.” This terminology implies a deliberate and coordinated effort to obstruct his opportunities, possibly through industry connections, influence over media narratives, and perhaps even direct intervention with potential collaborations or performances. The sense of being held back, coupled with the alleged smear campaign, has clearly fueled Kelvyn Boy’s frustration and prompted his public outcry.
The crux of Kelvyn Boy’s accusations centers around the belief that Stonebwoy has actively worked to turn the Ghanaian public against him, leveraging his established position and perceived “saintly” image to portray Kelvyn Boy in a negative light. This perceived manipulation of public perception has left Kelvyn Boy feeling isolated and unfairly judged, struggling to overcome the negative narrative that he believes Stonebwoy has cultivated. He questions the extent of Stonebwoy’s apparent vendetta, pointing to past incidents and implying a pattern of targeted attacks. The implication is that Stonebwoy is using his influence and platform to control the narrative surrounding their separation, effectively silencing Kelvyn Boy’s perspective and hindering his ability to defend himself.
Stonebwoy’s recent comments, describing Kelvyn Boy’s past actions as dangerous and claiming divine protection from harm, have further fueled the fire. His assertion that Kelvyn Boy is no longer welcome in his home further underscores the deep rift between the two artists. While the specifics of these “dangerous and deadly” actions remain unclear, Stonebwoy’s public pronouncements serve to reinforce the negative image of Kelvyn Boy, bolstering the narrative he appears to be constructing. This act of publicly labeling Kelvyn Boy’s behavior adds another layer to the ongoing feud and further complicates any potential reconciliation.
Kelvyn Boy’s response to Stonebwoy’s comments reveals a deep sense of paranoia and the belief that the attacks against him have escalated to potentially life-threatening levels. He alludes to previous attempts to sabotage his career, referring to a “PHASE 1” attack, the nature of which remains undefined. More alarmingly, he suggests that Stonebwoy is now stoking rumors about his death, indicating a fear that the campaign against him has moved beyond professional sabotage and into a realm of personal endangerment. This perceived escalation of the feud adds a chilling dimension to the public back-and-forth between the two artists.
The public airing of grievances between Kelvyn Boy and Stonebwoy continues to captivate public attention, with each new statement fueling the flames of their ongoing feud. The heart of the conflict appears to stem from unresolved issues surrounding Kelvyn Boy’s departure from Stonebwoy’s Burniton Music Group. This separation, rather than being a clean break, has devolved into a protracted public battle, characterized by accusations of betrayal, sabotage, and now, even veiled threats. The lack of clarity about the specific events that led to the initial rift, coupled with the escalating rhetoric from both sides, makes it challenging to discern the full truth. What is clear, however, is that the relationship between these two artists has deteriorated to a point of deep animosity and distrust, playing out in a very public and increasingly volatile manner. Their ongoing dispute serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of mentorship and the potential for acrimony when professional relationships fracture.
