Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu, former Majority Leader and Member of Parliament for Suame, has voiced serious concerns about the New Patriotic Party’s (NPP) delegate system, arguing that its over-monetization has fostered apathy among party members and necessitates a comprehensive overhaul. His critique stems from a fact-finding report he spearheaded, investigating the NPP’s performance in the Ashanti region during the 2020 elections. The overwhelming consensus from interviewees, including party officers, supporters, and sympathizers, pointed towards the need for a fundamental change in how the party selects its leaders and candidates. This call for reform primarily centers on expanding the voting base beyond the current limited delegate pool, potentially encompassing all card-bearing NPP members.
The current delegate system, according to the feedback gathered in the Ashanti region, has become heavily influenced by money. This financial element has created a barrier to entry for many potential candidates and has disenfranchised a significant portion of the party’s membership. The perception that leadership positions are effectively bought rather than earned based on merit has eroded trust and enthusiasm within the party ranks. Furthermore, this system has given rise to concerns about the influence of special interests and the potential for corruption, potentially leading to the selection of candidates who prioritize personal gain over the party’s welfare and the needs of the Ghanaian people.
The report highlighted a strong sentiment among party members in favor of democratizing the selection process. Many advocate for expanding the voting base to include all card-bearing members at every level of the party structure, from polling stations to the national level. This broadened participation, they believe, would inject fresh vitality into the NPP, reinvigorate its grassroots, and ensure that chosen representatives genuinely reflect the will and aspirations of the party’s broader base. Such a move would also address the current perception of exclusivity and elitism surrounding the delegate system, potentially leading to greater unity and a stronger sense of collective ownership within the party.
Beyond the delegate system, the report identified other contributing factors to the NPP’s electoral performance. Former President Nana Akufo-Addo’s leadership style was criticized for being overly rigid, centralized, and heavily influenced by a close circle of family members. This perceived insularity and lack of broader consultation within the party may have contributed to a disconnect with the grassroots and potentially alienated some party members. The lack of broader input and diverse perspectives in decision-making could have hindered the party’s ability to effectively address the concerns of its wider constituency and adapt to the evolving political landscape.
The concerns over the delegate system and leadership style intertwine, suggesting a pattern of centralized control that may have stifled internal debate and limited opportunities for broader participation within the NPP. The call for a more inclusive voting system reflects a desire for greater internal democracy and a more bottom-up approach to leadership selection. This sentiment underscores the importance of empowering grassroots members and ensuring that their voices are heard in shaping the party’s direction and future.
Moving forward, the NPP faces the crucial challenge of addressing these internal concerns to revitalize its base and regain momentum. Reforming the delegate system and fostering a more inclusive leadership style appear to be critical steps in this process. By embracing internal reform and actively engaging with the concerns of its members, the NPP can strengthen its internal cohesion, reconnect with its core values, and position itself for future electoral success. Failure to address these issues could lead to further disillusionment within the party ranks and hinder its ability to effectively compete in the evolving political landscape of Ghana.
