Lasmid, the Ghanaian music sensation known for his infectious melodies and unique vocal style, has responded to persistent critiques regarding the clarity of his lyrics. The artist, in a candid interview with Kwame Dadzie on Hitz FM, clarified that he doesn’t intentionally obscure his words, and the perceived difficulty in understanding his lyrics is often a consequence of the inherent interplay between melody and words in his music. He admitted that even he sometimes struggles to discern specific words after recording, attributing this phenomenon to the nature of music production, where the melodic flow often takes precedence. Lasmid emphasized that the artistic process prioritizes the overall musical experience, a fusion of melody and lyrics, where absolute clarity of every word isn’t always paramount.
The crux of Lasmid’s argument lies in his understanding of music as a blend of sonic elements, where lyrics, while important, integrate into the broader tapestry of melody and rhythm. This holistic approach to music creation sometimes leads to instances where individual words might get slightly lost or blended within the melodic flow. This, he explains, is not a deliberate attempt to create ambiguity or force replayability, but rather a natural outcome of prioritizing the overall musical feel. Lasmid believes that the fusion of melody and lyrics creates a complete artistic experience, where the sum is greater than the individual parts. The lyrics, while sometimes challenging to decipher, contribute to the overall emotional impact and rhythmic dynamism of the song.
Further elaborating on his creative process, Lasmid highlighted that he consciously strives for clear pronunciation during recording sessions. He refuted the notion that he intentionally muddies his lyrics to encourage repeated listening. He attributes the difficulty in understanding his words, in some cases, to listeners’ lack of attentiveness. He suggested that a more focused listen might reveal the nuances and intricacies of his lyrical delivery, which often get overlooked in a casual listening experience. Lasmid acknowledged that while he takes responsibility for his artistic choices, the listeners also share a role in fully appreciating the intended message within his music.
Lasmid’s response sheds light on the artistic complexities involved in music creation. It challenges the conventional notion that lyrics should always be perfectly clear and easily understood, arguing instead for a more nuanced understanding of music as a holistic experience. His explanation unveils a perspective where melody and rhythm intertwine with lyrics to create a complete artistic statement. The occasional ambiguity, he suggests, is not a flaw but an inherent feature of a musical style that prioritizes the overall feel and flow, inviting the listener to actively engage with the music and discover layers of meaning beyond the immediately apparent.
The discussion surrounding Lasmid’s lyrical clarity also touches upon the broader question of artistic interpretation and the listener’s role in decoding musical meaning. While clarity and diction are essential aspects of vocal performance, Lasmid’s approach suggests that these elements shouldn’t be treated in isolation but rather evaluated in conjunction with the overall musical context. His perspective opens up a dialogue about the balance between lyrical clarity and artistic expression, prompting a re-evaluation of how we perceive and interpret music. It invites us to move beyond a purely literal understanding of lyrics and embrace the emotional and rhythmic nuances that contribute to the overall aesthetic experience.
In conclusion, Lasmid’s response to the criticisms offers valuable insight into his artistic philosophy and creative process. It underscores his commitment to musicality over strict adherence to lyrical clarity, emphasizing the importance of the overall listening experience. While acknowledging the challenges some listeners face in understanding his lyrics, he also highlights the role of the listener in actively engaging with the music to decipher the intended meaning. His perspective challenges us to re-examine our expectations regarding lyrical clarity and appreciate the interplay of musical elements that contribute to a richer and more nuanced artistic expression.
