The Jigawa PDP Congress Dispute: A Deep Dive into Intra-Party Conflict and the Pursuit of Justice
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Jigawa State finds itself embroiled in a legal battle over the legitimacy of its recently conducted congresses. A lawsuit filed by Dahiru Mujaddadi against the party and four other key figures challenges the conduct of the ward, local government, and state congresses, alleging irregularities and a departure from democratic principles. The case, filed on May 8, 2025, in the Federal High Court in Dutse, has been adjourned to May 28, 2025, by Justice Hassan Dikko, giving both sides time to prepare their arguments for what promises to be a pivotal moment in the state’s PDP chapter. The outcome of this legal challenge could significantly reshape the party’s landscape in Jigawa and set a precedent for future intra-party disputes.
At the heart of the dispute lies the accusation of undemocratic practices during the congresses. Abba Anas, a member of the Jigawa State PDP Committee for Justice and Equity, representing the plaintiff, contends that the congresses were marred by irregularities, including the alleged conduct of some local government elections in private residences and the characterization of the state congress as more akin to appointments than elections. These allegations paint a picture of a process that deviated significantly from the established guidelines and constitution of the PDP, raising concerns about fairness, transparency, and the democratic principles upon which the party is founded. The plaintiff’s arguments highlight the potential for such deviations to undermine the integrity of the party’s internal structure and erode trust among its members.
The defendants in the case include prominent figures within the PDP hierarchy, including the National Organising Secretary, Umar M. Bature; former state party chairman, Alhaji Ali Diginsa; Sheriff Abdullahi, Chairman of the Jigawa State Local Government Congress Electoral Committee; and Bello Isyaku, Chairman of the Local Government Congress Electoral Appeal Committee in Jigawa. Their inclusion in the lawsuit underscores the gravity of the allegations and the potential implications for the party’s leadership at both the state and national levels. The court’s decision will not only determine the validity of the congresses but also scrutinize the actions and decisions of these key figures.
Central to the plaintiff’s argument is the claim that the party’s affairs in Jigawa are being run as a "one-man show," marginalizing a significant segment of the membership. This allegation of exclusionary practices raises fundamental questions about the internal dynamics of the party and the extent to which all members have a voice in its decision-making processes. The claim suggests a concentration of power that stifles dissent and undermines the spirit of inclusivity that is essential for a healthy and vibrant political party. The plaintiff argues that this marginalization has fueled internal divisions and warns that without a course correction, these divisions could deepen, further destabilizing the party.
The plaintiff’s pursuit of justice through the courts highlights the importance of adherence to democratic principles within political parties. The case serves as a reminder that internal party processes should reflect the same values of transparency, fairness, and accountability that parties advocate for in the broader political arena. The legal challenge is not merely a dispute over procedural matters but a fight for the soul of the party and its commitment to democratic ideals. The court’s decision will have profound implications, not only for the PDP in Jigawa but also for the broader political landscape, potentially influencing how other parties conduct their internal affairs.
Looking ahead, the adjournment until May 28, 2025, provides an opportunity for both sides to present their arguments comprehensively and for the court to carefully consider the evidence presented. Political observers recognize the significant implications of this case for the future of the PDP in Jigawa State. The outcome could either validate the existing leadership and its actions or mandate a restructuring of the party’s internal organization. In the interim, the plaintiff continues to call for greater inclusivity and fairness within the party, urging the leadership to reflect on its approach to governance and prioritize internal democracy. The court’s decision will undoubtedly be a watershed moment, providing clarity on the way forward and offering valuable lessons for the PDP and other political parties across the country.
