Bernard Mornah, the 2024 presidential candidate of the People’s National Convention (PNC), has unequivocally stated that his party does not expect or demand ministerial appointments from President John Dramani Mahama, despite the PNC’s endorsement of Mahama and the National Democratic Congress (NDC) during the 2024 elections. Mornah emphasizes that the PNC’s support for the NDC was driven by a desire for political change and not by an expectation of political rewards. He acknowledges that the decision to appoint ministers rests solely with President Mahama, and whether or not PNC members are included in the administration is entirely the President’s prerogative. Mornah stresses that the PNC will continue to function as a distinct political entity, providing constructive criticism and support for government policies as needed, regardless of their representation within the government.
Mornah’s statement underscores the PNC’s commitment to maintaining its independent political identity and not becoming beholden to the NDC. He clarifies that the party’s support for Mahama was a strategic decision aimed at achieving a broader political objective, not a quid pro quo arrangement for ministerial positions. The PNC’s history, Mornah points out, demonstrates a willingness to collaborate with different administrations for the betterment of the nation, irrespective of direct involvement in the government. He cites examples of PNC members serving in previous governments, including those of John Kufuor, John Atta Mills, and even Mahama’s first term, highlighting the party’s consistent approach to national politics. This history, he argues, demonstrates that the PNC’s support for the NDC in 2024 was not motivated by self-interest but by a principled stance on the need for change.
The PNC’s position, as articulated by Mornah, clarifies the nature of its relationship with the NDC and emphasizes the party’s commitment to principled political engagement. Their support for the NDC was not transactional, but a considered decision based on the belief that the NDC offered the best path towards the desired political change. This approach distinguishes the PNC’s support from a political bargain, demonstrating a focus on national interests rather than party-specific gains. Mornah’s statement reinforces the PNC’s independence and its commitment to maintaining its distinct political voice, even while collaborating with other parties on shared objectives.
The timing of Mornah’s statement is significant, coming after President Mahama’s announcement of his third batch of ministerial appointments, which brought the total number of ministers to 42. President Mahama, who has reduced the number of ministries since taking office, has pledged to limit the total number of ministerial appointments to 60 as part of a cost-cutting initiative. In this context, Mornah’s statement preemptively addresses any speculation about the PNC’s expectations or potential disappointment regarding ministerial appointments. It reinforces the message that the PNC’s support for the NDC was not contingent on receiving positions within the government.
This clear articulation of the PNC’s stance allows for a more transparent understanding of the political landscape and the dynamics between the two parties. It removes any ambiguity surrounding the PNC’s motivations and expectations, highlighting their commitment to principled political engagement. Mornah’s statement effectively manages potential narratives of dissatisfaction or entitlement, emphasizing the PNC’s focus on broader political goals rather than individual political rewards.
By proactively addressing the issue of ministerial appointments, Mornah and the PNC demonstrate their commitment to transparent and principled political engagement. Their support for the NDC was driven by a shared vision for political change, not by the expectation of personal gain. This approach strengthens the PNC’s image as a party dedicated to national interests and reinforces its independent political identity. The PNC’s stance serves as a valuable example of principled political collaboration, demonstrating that support for another party can be based on shared goals and values rather than transactional expectations.
