Abena Osei-Asare, the Member of Parliament for Atiwa East and former Deputy Minister for Finance, has recently been the subject of criticism regarding her contributions to the New Patriotic Party (NPP). Kwabena Frimpong, the Deputy Protocol Director of the NPP, has vehemently defended Osei-Asare, denouncing the criticisms as unfounded and dishonest. He highlighted her extensive support for party members throughout the country, citing job creation, financial aid, and educational support as examples of her tangible contributions. Frimpong emphasized Osei-Asare’s role in elevating many party members to positions of influence and improving their lives and the fortunes of their families. He contrasted her quiet, effective approach with those who are more vocal but less productive. He argued that Osei-Asare’s actions demonstrate her commitment to the party and its members, making her a valuable asset to the NPP.
Frimpong’s defense of Osei-Asare centers on her tangible impact on the lives of NPP members. He portrays her as a “Destiny Changer” and a “Mother Figure” (Obaatanpa), emphasizing her personal investment in the well-being and advancement of individuals within the party. He suggests that her contributions are not limited to her constituency but extend nationwide. He underscores the transformative nature of her support, claiming that many individuals owe their current positions and improved circumstances to her assistance. This portrayal aims to establish Osei-Asare as a dedicated and effective member of the NPP who works tirelessly behind the scenes, even if her efforts are not always publicly acknowledged. Frimpong’s argument is that her actions speak louder than words and that her impact on the party is undeniable.
The Deputy Protocol Director also cautioned against internal divisions and the spread of damaging propaganda, particularly as the 2028 elections approach. He expressed concern that such negativity could undermine the party’s unity and jeopardize its chances of success in the future. Frimpong implied that these attacks on Osei-Asare are part of a deliberate effort to damage the reputations of key NPP leaders, potentially orchestrated by the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC) with assistance from state security agencies. He urged party members to exercise caution in their words and actions, emphasizing the importance of unity, discipline, and respect for leadership in order to secure victory in the upcoming elections. He warned against becoming unwitting participants in the opposition’s alleged scheme to weaken the NPP from within.
Frimpong directly addressed the question of Osei-Asare’s value to the party, characterizing it as laughable and dishonest. He highlighted her contributions beyond her constituency of Atiwa East, emphasizing her nationwide impact. He specifically mentioned job creation, educational support, business assistance, and employment facilitation as areas where Osei-Asare has made a significant difference in the lives of party members. He underscored her role in helping young people and loyal party members achieve positions of dignity and influence. By presenting concrete examples of her positive impact, Frimpong sought to dispel the notion that Osei-Asare has not contributed significantly to the party. He further suggested that listing the individuals and regions she has helped would be overwhelming evidence of her dedication and impact.
The statement suggests a deeper political context within the NPP. Frimpong’s defense of Osei-Asare seems to be a response to an internal campaign to discredit her, possibly linked to upcoming presidential primaries. He frames the criticisms against her as unwarranted attacks fueled by political maneuvering. The mention of “loud talkers” suggests a contrast between those who prioritize self-promotion and those, like Osei-Asare, who focus on delivering tangible results. By highlighting Osei-Asare’s contributions, Frimpong implicitly criticizes those who prioritize personal ambition over the welfare of the party and its members. This indicates potential internal conflicts within the NPP and suggests that Osei-Asare’s detractors may be motivated by personal gain or political rivalry rather than genuine concern for the party’s best interests.
The statement also raises concerns about the potential influence of external forces on the NPP’s internal dynamics. Frimpong’s allegation of NDC involvement, supported by state security, suggests an attempt to destabilize the NPP by targeting its key figures. This adds another layer of complexity to the situation, portraying Osei-Asare not just as a victim of internal rivalry, but also as a target of a coordinated external campaign. Frimpong uses this narrative to rally support for Osei-Asare and to warn against internal divisions that could be exploited by the opposition. He urges party members to prioritize unity and loyalty to prevent the opposition from succeeding in its alleged efforts to weaken the party. This call for unity serves as a concluding message, emphasizing the importance of internal cohesion in the face of external threats and internal political maneuvering.
