The New Patriotic Party (NPP) is grappling with internal discord stemming from the public pronouncements of former Dome-Kwabenya Member of Parliament, Adwoa Safo, against party leaders. Hackman Owusu Agyemang, Chairman of the NPP’s Council of Elders, has sharply condemned Safo’s actions, labeling them as a breach of party discipline and decorum. He emphasized that her public criticisms are unacceptable and will not be tolerated, confirming that the party’s General Secretary has initiated the process of referring her to the disciplinary committee for formal action.
The core issue revolves around Safo’s persistent public statements criticizing the party leadership. Owusu Agyemang unequivocally demanded that she cease all such pronouncements, stressing that her actions violate established party rules and protocols. He expressed profound disappointment, highlighting the incongruity between her behavior and her previous senior positions within both the government and the NPP. This disappointment underscores the seriousness with which the party views her conduct, suggesting that her actions are seen as a betrayal of the trust and responsibility she once held.
The NPP’s response, as articulated by Owusu Agyemang, will be guided by the party’s internal regulations. While the specific disciplinary measures remain to be determined, the chairman’s statements indicate a firm resolve to address the situation decisively. He hinted at a range of possible outcomes, suggesting that the severity of the consequences will depend on Safo’s response to the party’s directive to cease her public criticisms. This approach suggests a willingness to consider mitigating factors if Safo demonstrates remorse and compliance.
The chairman’s call for Safo to immediately halt her media engagements and public commentary further emphasizes the party’s commitment to resolving the issue internally. This directive underscores the NPP’s preference for addressing internal disputes through established party mechanisms rather than engaging in public exchanges. It also suggests an attempt to contain the damage caused by Safo’s statements and prevent further escalation of the conflict.
The party’s approach reflects a balance between upholding discipline and allowing for reconciliation. While Owusu Agyemang’s words were strong and unequivocal in condemning Safo’s actions, they also hinted at a pathway back to good standing. The emphasis on adherence to the General Secretary’s directive suggests that the party is willing to consider a less punitive approach if Safo demonstrates a willingness to cooperate and abide by party rules. This measured response suggests a desire to avoid a protracted and damaging internal conflict.
Ultimately, the situation hinges on Adwoa Safo’s response to the party’s directives. The NPP’s leadership has made its position clear: her public criticisms are unacceptable and must cease. The party’s subsequent actions, including the potential disciplinary measures, will be determined by her willingness to comply with this directive. The case represents a test of the NPP’s internal processes and its ability to effectively manage dissent and maintain party unity in the face of public challenges from within its ranks. The outcome will likely set a precedent for how the party handles similar situations in the future and could have significant implications for its internal cohesion and public image.
