The controversy surrounding the National Cathedral project in Ghana has intensified, sparking calls for a thorough investigation into its financial management. Former Deputy Finance Minister, Dr. Stephen Amoah, despite his affiliation with the ruling New Patriotic Party (NPP) which initiated the project, has publicly endorsed the demand for accountability. He acknowledges the legitimacy of concerns raised about the project’s funding, emphasizing the need for transparency and a comprehensive audit to address public anxieties. While expressing his personal support for the cathedral’s concept as a Christian, Dr. Amoah maintains that proper financial scrutiny is crucial to ensure public trust and address potential irregularities. His position reflects a growing unease within the ruling party and the broader public regarding the project’s financial aspects.
The National Cathedral project, envisioned as a national monument dedicated to Christian worship and interdenominational harmony, has been mired in controversy since its inception. Initially presented as a privately funded initiative, the project has increasingly relied on public funds, raising questions about transparency and the government’s prioritization of expenditure. Critics argue that allocating substantial public resources to the cathedral amidst pressing economic challenges and social needs demonstrates misplaced priorities. The project’s hefty price tag and the perceived lack of transparency in its financial dealings have fueled public skepticism and accusations of mismanagement.
Adding to the controversy is the project’s location in Accra’s central business district. Critics, including Dr. Amoah, argue that the chosen site, adjacent to the International Conference Centre and Parliament House, is unsuitable. They contend that demolishing existing state-owned buildings in a prime location to make way for the cathedral represents a wasteful use of valuable public assets. Alternative locations, they argue, could have been considered to minimize disruption and optimize land use. The location debate highlights broader concerns about the project’s planning and execution.
The Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ), a key independent constitutional body, has added its voice to the growing chorus of concern. Following an investigation prompted by a petition from Member of Parliament Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, CHRAJ has recommended a forensic audit of the project. The investigation uncovered violations of Ghana’s procurement laws, particularly concerning the awarding of the construction contract to Ribade Company Ltd. This revelation further underscores the need for a thorough and independent financial audit to ascertain the extent of any irregularities and hold accountable those responsible.
The CHRAJ recommendation for a forensic audit represents a significant development in the ongoing saga of the National Cathedral. It adds weight to the public demand for transparency and accountability and places pressure on the government to address the concerns raised. The audit, if conducted effectively, will shed light on the project’s financial dealings and determine whether public funds have been appropriately utilized. Its findings will be crucial in restoring public confidence and shaping the future trajectory of the project.
The National Cathedral project, initially conceived as a symbol of national unity and faith, has become a source of division and contention. The controversy surrounding its funding, location, and procurement processes has eroded public trust and exposed potential weaknesses in governance and oversight. The calls for investigation and the CHRAJ recommendation for a forensic audit underscore the urgency of addressing these concerns and ensuring transparency and accountability in the management of public resources. The outcome of the audit and the government’s response will be crucial in determining the project’s future and its impact on public perception.
