Dr. Nyaho Nyaho-Tamakloe, a veteran statesman and founding member of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), has issued a stern warning against any attempts to circumvent Ghana’s constitution, particularly regarding presidential term limits. His statement comes in response to certain charismatic pastors advocating for a third term for former President John Dramani Mahama, a proposition Dr. Nyaho-Tamakloe vehemently opposes. He emphasizes that Ghana is governed by its constitution, not by prophetic declarations, and warns against the dangers of mixing religion and politics in such a manner. He invokes Article 66 of the 1992 Constitution, which explicitly limits presidential terms to two, as the ultimate legal authority in this matter, stressing that any alteration requires a national referendum, not religious pronouncements.
Dr. Nyaho-Tamakloe’s concerns stem from a deep understanding of Ghana’s history and the potential for instability when religious figures overstep their bounds and interfere in political affairs. He draws a parallel to the tumultuous 1970s, particularly the Union Government (UNIGOV) crisis under General I.K. Acheampong. During this period, religious leaders encouraged Acheampong’s pursuit of an unconstitutional third term, cloaked in the rhetoric of national unity. This ultimately led to a breakdown of military cohesion, a palace coup, and paved the way for the June 4, 1979 revolution led by Flt. Lt. Jerry John Rawlings. Dr. Nyaho-Tamakloe uses this historical precedent as a cautionary tale, warning against repeating the mistakes of the past.
He argues that these “prophecies” not only disregard the rule of law but also risk transforming religious institutions into political platforms, thereby eroding public trust and creating confusion among followers. He calls for a clear separation between religion and politics, urging religious leaders to focus on their spiritual duties and refrain from interfering in constitutional matters. He highlights the importance of adhering to the established legal and political processes for any potential constitutional amendments, emphasizing that these decisions should not be influenced by religious pronouncements.
Furthermore, Dr. Nyaho-Tamakloe asserts that former President Mahama should be allowed to preserve his legacy without being drawn into a manufactured controversy fueled by these pronouncements. He contends that Ghana needs leaders focused on tangible issues such as agriculture, job creation, and good governance, rather than individuals engaged in what he terms “theatrical spirituality” that distorts truth and sows discord. He characterizes such actions as prioritizing personal ambition and populist sentiment over the nation’s well-being and constitutional integrity.
The statement reflects a broader national concern over the increasing intersection of religion and politics in Ghana. Dr. Nyaho-Tamakloe’s forceful critique of this phenomenon serves as a call for a return to constitutional discipline and responsible public discourse. He advocates for upholding the principles of democracy and the rule of law, arguing that Ghana’s peace and stability should not be jeopardized by politically motivated religious pronouncements. He emphasizes the importance of civic responsibility and the need for all citizens, particularly religious leaders, to respect and adhere to the Constitution.
In his concluding remarks, Dr. Nyaho-Tamakloe reiterates his condemnation of what he views as manipulative tactics disguised as divine guidance. He urges the political class to be allowed to function without undue influence from religious figures and calls for an end to this practice. He firmly believes that Ghana deserves better than to be subjected to such manipulations and calls for adherence to the rule of law and the principles of democratic governance. His statement is a plea for reason, constitutional adherence, and a clear separation between the realms of religion and politics, ultimately advocating for the preservation of Ghana’s democratic future.
