The Shadow of June 12: Olanipekun’s Critique of Babangida’s Autobiography and the Call for National Restructuring
Wole Olanipekun, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and former President of the Nigerian Bar Association, has launched a scathing critique of General Ibrahim Babangida’s recently published autobiography, "Insightful Journey on Nigeria’s Political Evolution." The central point of contention revolves around Babangida’s handling of the June 12, 1993, presidential election, widely believed to have been won by Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola. Olanipekun argues that despite expressing regret over the annulment, Babangida’s narrative lacks a genuine apology to the Abiola family and the Nigerian people. This perceived lack of remorse, according to Olanipekun, undermines the sincerity of Babangida’s reflections and perpetuates the sense of injustice surrounding the annulment. Speaking at a lecture in honor of Pastor Enoch Adeboye’s 83rd birthday, Olanipekun framed his criticism within a broader discussion of justice and equity as solutions to Nigeria’s socio-economic problems.
Olanipekun’s critique goes beyond merely pointing out the absence of a direct apology. He characterizes Babangida’s account of the annulment as riddled with contradictions, further casting doubt on the former military leader’s narrative. The SAN goes so far as to label Babangida’s actions as treasonable, both at the time and in the present context. This strong condemnation underscores the profound impact of the annulment on Nigeria’s democratic trajectory and the lingering resentment it continues to evoke. The timing of the autobiography’s release, close to the 30th anniversary of the annulment, likely amplified the sensitivity of the issue and contributed to the polarized reactions it has received. Olanipekun’s remarks place him firmly among those who view Babangida’s legacy as irrevocably tainted by the annulment and its enduring consequences.
The annulment of the June 12 election remains a pivotal moment in Nigeria’s history. Considered by many to be the freest and fairest election in the nation’s history, its cancellation triggered a period of political instability and social unrest. The subsequent imprisonment of Abiola, the presumed winner, further exacerbated the situation and cemented the annulment as a symbol of injustice and a betrayal of the democratic process. Olanipekun’s criticism draws heavily on this historical context, emphasizing the gravity of the event and its continued relevance to contemporary Nigerian politics. He argues that without a full reckoning with the past, including a sincere apology and acknowledgment of wrongdoing, the wounds of June 12 will continue to fester.
Beyond the specific critique of Babangida’s autobiography, Olanipekun’s remarks connect the June 12 annulment to the broader issue of national restructuring. He argues that Nigeria’s current political structure is inherently flawed and that a fundamental restructuring is necessary for the country to achieve stability and prosperity. This call for restructuring echoes the sentiments of many Nigerians who believe that the current system perpetuates inequality and hinders development. Olanipekun’s linkage of June 12 to the need for restructuring suggests that he sees the annulment not simply as an isolated event but as a symptom of deeper systemic issues that must be addressed. He positions the annulment as a stark reminder of the fragility of democratic institutions and the urgent need for reforms to ensure the protection of fundamental rights and the promotion of good governance.
The lecture at which Olanipekun delivered his critique was held in honor of Pastor Enoch Adeboye, the General Overseer of the Redeemed Christian Church of God. Olanipekun described Adeboye as a "living legend" who has made significant contributions to societal values and upliftment. The choice of this platform to address such a politically charged issue underscores the importance of the June 12 annulment in the national consciousness. It also suggests a willingness to engage with sensitive political topics within religious and social contexts, demonstrating the interconnectedness of these spheres in Nigeria. The event brought together diverse voices, including Justice Eni Esan (retd.), who addressed the issue of corruption, highlighting the multifaceted nature of Nigeria’s challenges.
Justice Esan, Chairperson of the Oyo State Anti-Corruption Agency, echoed Olanipekun’s concerns, placing blame on the political class for the systemic corruption plaguing the country. Her call for reforms to cleanse the system reinforces the theme of systemic change articulated by Olanipekun. This shared emphasis on the need for reform suggests a growing consensus across different sectors of Nigerian society regarding the urgency of addressing the nation’s deep-seated challenges. The combined voices of Olanipekun and Esan underscore the imperative of tackling both political and economic injustices in order to achieve genuine national progress. Folu Adeboye, representing her husband Pastor Adeboye, urged Nigerians to take control of their destiny and become agents of positive change, reinforcing the message of individual responsibility and collective action for national transformation.
