The retaliatory actions undertaken by National Democratic Congress (NDC) loyalists following their assumption of power have sparked debate and concern. Professor Vincent Asanful, Chairman of the Convocation Board at the University of Cape Coast, offers a nuanced perspective on this complex issue, characterizing the situation as both regrettable and understandable. His analysis sheds light on the historical context of these actions, drawing parallels to similar incidents during previous transitions of power, particularly when the New Patriotic Party (NPP) assumed control. Professor Asanful’s insights provide a framework for understanding the motivations behind these actions and suggest potential pathways towards mitigating such occurrences in the future.
Professor Asanful highlights a key driver of these retaliatory actions: the perceived mistreatment of NDC members during the previous NPP administration. He cites instances where individuals associated with the National Disaster Management Organization (NADMO), perceived as NDC affiliates, were allegedly removed from their positions under the pretext of not being Ghanaian citizens. This historical precedent, according to Professor Asanful, fuels a sense of injustice and retribution among NDC supporters, contributing to the current wave of retaliatory actions. While acknowledging the regrettable nature of these actions, he emphasizes the need to understand the underlying grievances that propel them.
Addressing the concerns of party loyalists regarding appointments, Professor Asanful underscores the importance of clear communication from the party leadership. He suggests that the leadership needs to proactively engage with its base, explaining the rationale behind appointments that may not align with the expectations of all members. He stresses the importance of recognizing that contributions to the party can take various forms, not all of which are readily apparent to every individual. Therefore, a lack of familiarity with an appointee should not automatically be interpreted as a sign of disloyalty or disregard for the party’s base. Open communication and transparency, he argues, are crucial for maintaining party unity and preventing misunderstandings that can escalate into retaliatory actions.
The issue of public toilet seizures, a recurring phenomenon during transitions of power, further illustrates the complexities of political patronage and local power dynamics. Professor Asanful reveals the existence of informal agreements between the NDC and NPP in certain regions, designed to facilitate the peaceful transfer of control over public toilets. These agreements, while not legally binding, represent a pragmatic approach to managing a potentially volatile issue. The smooth handover of these facilities in regions where such agreements exist demonstrates the potential for cooperation and peaceful coexistence, even amidst intense political rivalry.
To mitigate future occurrences of retaliatory actions and promote a more stable political environment, Professor Asanful advocates for a multi-pronged approach. He emphasizes the crucial role of party leaders in managing the expectations and behavior of their supporters. Leaders, he argues, must actively discourage retaliatory actions and promote restraint, emphasizing the importance of respecting due process and the rule of law. This proactive approach to leadership is essential for creating a political culture that values peaceful transitions of power and discourages acts of retribution.
Furthermore, Professor Asanful offers advice to political appointees, particularly those whose positions are primarily based on political affiliation rather than professional merit. He suggests that such individuals should consider resigning voluntarily rather than waiting to be forcibly removed. This proactive approach, he argues, not only avoids the potential humiliation of forced removal but also contributes to a smoother and more dignified transition of power. By acknowledging the inherently political nature of their appointments and accepting the change in political landscape, these individuals can help de-escalate tensions and contribute to a more peaceful and respectful political environment. This, in turn, sets a precedent for future transitions and encourages a greater emphasis on professional merit in public service appointments.
