Professor Agyeman Badu Akosa, a former CPP presidential aspirant, has ignited a debate by urging Nkrumaists to consider aligning with the National Democratic Congress (NDC). His argument hinges on the perceived ideological proximity of the NDC to the Nkrumaist tradition, coupled with the dwindling influence of Nkrumaist parties in contemporary Ghanaian politics. Akosa’s call stems from a sense of frustration over the sustained inability of Nkrumaist parties to gain significant political traction. He points to his own unsuccessful presidential bid in 2007 as an example of this struggle, highlighting the nearly two decades of limited political impact since then. The passing of key figures like Jerry Rawlings, Hilla Limann, and other prominent Nkrumaist leaders further supports his assertion that the political landscape has shifted, leaving a void that the NDC might be best positioned to fill within the context of Nkrumaist ideals.
Akosa’s argument unfolds against the backdrop of what he characterizes as a disastrous eight-year tenure of the NPP government, referencing author Arthur Kennedy’s analogy of the “elephant in the room” finally being sent back to its domain. This perceived failure of the NPP administration reinforces, in Akosa’s view, the urgency for Nkrumaists to actively support the NDC, the party he deems to be the current best hope for carrying forward the legacy of Nkrumah’s vision. He emphasizes the need to capitalize on this political opportunity to steer Ghana towards a path aligned with Nkrumaist principles of social justice, economic independence, and Pan-Africanism.
Central to Akosa’s call for Nkrumaist-NDC collaboration is his belief that the NDC, despite its historical roots in the revolution led by Jerry Rawlings, which some see as a departure from Nkrumaism, now represents the closest approximation to the Nkrumaist ideology in the current political landscape. He contends that with the passing of key figures associated with both the NDC and the CPP, historical divisions have lessened, opening up an avenue for convergence based on shared principles. He subtly implies that the NDC, freed from the direct influence of Rawlings, is more amenable to embracing the core tenets of Nkrumaism, making it a viable political home for those who subscribe to those ideals.
Furthermore, Akosa underlines the pragmatic aspect of his argument. He stresses that supporting the NDC is not merely a matter of ideological alignment; it’s a strategic move to contribute to the success of a government poised to address the challenges facing Ghana. He implies that a fragmented Nkrumaist movement, consistently failing to make an impact on national politics, risks further marginalization. By consolidating support behind the NDC, Nkrumaists can leverage their collective influence to shape policy and contribute meaningfully to the nation’s progress. He casts this as a more effective approach than continuing a cycle of futile attempts to revive politically fragmented Nkrumaist parties.
Akosa preemptively addresses potential criticisms regarding personal motivations. He categorically states that his call to action isn’t driven by self-interest or a desire for personal gain. He cites his financial independence as evidence, highlighting his ability to “survive quite well” without political appointment. By doing so, he frames his argument as a purely principled stance, rooted in his belief that Nkrumaist ideals are best served through a strategic alliance with the NDC. He implicitly challenges his fellow Nkrumaists to prioritize national interest above personal ambitions and to consider the long-term benefits of political pragmatism over ideological purity.
Finally, Akosa’s call for collaboration transcends mere political maneuvering; it’s a call for Ghana to effectively utilize its intellectual resources. He argues that a nation failing to harness its intellectual capacity is destined to remain stagnant. By urging Nkrumaists to join the NDC, he advocates for a concentrated effort to contribute to national development. He suggests that by pooling their intellectual capital within a larger, more influential political platform, Nkrumaists can exert a greater impact on policy and contribute to a more progressive national agenda, reflecting the core principles of Nkrumaism while acknowledging the current political realities. He implies that continued fragmentation among Nkrumaists dilutes their collective voice and diminishes their potential contribution to Ghana’s progress.
