The Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) issued a two-week ultimatum to importers to clear 905 overtime cargoes languishing at various terminals in Lagos State, failing which the goods would be forfeited to the Federal Government. This action, while consistent with established customs procedures, has sparked significant concern and calls for an extension from licensed customs agents, who argue that the stipulated timeframe is inadequate given the prevailing circumstances. They cite a variety of challenges hindering importers’ ability to comply, ranging from financial constraints and logistical bottlenecks to systemic issues within the port infrastructure.
Licensed agents, representing the interests of importers, have voiced strong opposition to the two-week deadline, emphasizing the potential for substantial financial losses for businesses. They advocate for a more lenient approach, proposing an extension of the grace period to allow importers sufficient time to navigate the complex clearance procedures and mobilize the necessary resources. Their arguments center on the understanding that many importers are grappling with genuine difficulties beyond their control, and the short timeframe exacerbates these challenges, effectively penalizing businesses for circumstances they cannot readily overcome. The agents believe a more reasonable timeframe would provide importers with a greater chance to salvage their investments and contribute to the economy.
A prominent member of the National Council of Managing Directors of Licensed Customs Agents, Mr. Abayomi Duyile, argued that the two-week period is excessively short and urged the government to intervene by requesting shipping companies to subsidize demurrage charges, which accrue daily for containers left uncleared beyond the allotted free time. This, he believes, would alleviate some of the financial burden on importers and facilitate the clearance process. He further emphasized that the primary objective should be to support businesses and prevent unnecessary losses rather than resorting to forfeiture, which ultimately benefits no one.
Adding their voice to the chorus of dissent, the Association of Registered Freight Forwarders of Nigeria highlighted the persistent network issues plaguing the port operations. Mr. Taiwo Fatobilola, the National Public Relations Officer, questioned the feasibility of complying with the two-week deadline when the very infrastructure required for processing payments and documentation is unreliable. He stressed the need for a functional and efficient system to support the clearance process, arguing that holding importers accountable for delays caused by systemic failures is unjust. He proposed that the government prioritize improving the working conditions and infrastructure for terminal operators before imposing stricter deadlines or demanding reductions in charges. He reasoned that sustainable solutions require a holistic approach, addressing the root causes of the delays rather than simply shifting the burden from one party to another.
Further highlighting the financial constraints faced by many importers, Mr. Stanley Ezenga of the National Association of Government Approved Freight Forwarders contended that even a one-year extension might be insufficient for some. He pointed out that many businesses are struggling with limited financial resources, making it difficult to settle outstanding fees and secure the release of their goods. He urged the government to adopt a more compassionate approach, recognizing the genuine economic hardships faced by importers and providing them with a realistic window of opportunity to meet their obligations. He emphasized that extending the deadline is not about condoning non-compliance but rather about providing practical support to businesses facing genuine difficulties.
While acknowledging the concerns raised by agents, the NCS maintains that the disposal of overtime cargoes is a routine procedure governed by established legal frameworks. Mr. Abdullahi Maiwada, the National Public Relations Officer, explained that the 30-day grace period for clearing goods, followed by a transfer to the zonal office and subsequently to headquarters, is standard practice. If the importer fails to clear the goods within these stipulated timeframes, the items are condemned by a court of law, and a public notice is issued in newspapers, providing a final two-week window for clearance before disposal. This process, he argues, is transparent and ensures due process, providing ample opportunity for importers to claim their goods before final forfeiture. He also emphasized that the NCS’s actions are in line with legal requirements and designed to maintain the efficiency of port operations, which are crucial to the nation’s economy.
