Kenneth Okonkwo, a prominent figure in the Labour Party, has made strong statements regarding the responsibilities of politicians in Nigeria, particularly in light of the recent Local Government Area elections in Rivers State. He explicitly remarked that any politician unwilling to serve the electorate due to fears for their safety should resign from their position. This declaration came in response to the tumultuous events surrounding the elections, which took place despite significant challenges, including the withdrawal of the Nigeria Police Force and resistance from supporters of influential political figures like Nyesom Wike, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.
In an interview following the elections, Okonkwo commended Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara for his unwavering determination to proceed with the electoral process under difficult circumstances. He praised Fubara for fighting for citizens’ rights and noted that such tenacity is crucial for the strengthening of Nigeria’s democracy. Okonkwo emphasized that politicians must be willing to confront adversities, including potential threats to their safety, if they genuinely wish to represent the will of the people who elected them.
Okonkwo expressed disapproval for politicians who shy away from taking risks associated with their roles. He articulated that true leadership requires a readiness to face challenges, saying that those who are not prepared to confront threats to their lives and security should step aside to allow others who are more committed to take the lead. He underscored that political engagement inherently involves risks, and enduring them is part of public service.
Furthermore, he pointed to the contrasting behaviors exhibited by politicians, taking Fubara as a model of resilience and assertiveness. Okonkwo criticized those who opt for passivity or who urge calm in the face of injustices, arguing that such inaction undermines the very essence of democratic governance. He stated that if leaders refrain from defending their electoral rights, it reflects poorly on their commitment to the electorate and the democratic process.
He also voiced concerns regarding the broader implications of political passivity in Rivers State. Okonkwo indicated that if Fubara had adopted a less confrontational stance, the outcome of the elections could have been significantly different, perhaps leading to a compromised electoral process. By portraying Fubara’s resoluteness as a necessary approach, Okonkwo called for more leaders with a similar mindset—those willing to advocate firmly against election rigging and manipulation.
In conclusion, Kenneth Okonkwo’s remarks serve as a clarion call for politicians in Nigeria, urging them to embody the courage and commitment required to serve their constituents genuinely. His emphasis on active engagement in the face of adversity resonates with the present political climate, underlining the need for leaders who not only resist electoral injustices but are also steadfast in their mission to uphold democracy. He insists that without such commitment, the Labour Party, and politics in general, cannot advance effectively.
