The conversation between Solomon Bob, the lawmaker representing Ahoada East/Abua/Odual Federal Constituency of Rivers State in Nigeria, and journalist Dirisu Yakubu highlights a significant legislative initiative: the removal of the immunity clause for the vice president, governors, and deputy governors. Bob argues that the immunity clause, which was initially included in the constitution to ensure that high-ranking officials focus on governance, has led to rampant impunity and corruption. He compares Nigeria’s legal environment to that of the United States, questioning the rationale behind the argument that immunity protects officials from litigation. He maintains that the real issue lies in the unchecked power and malfeasance that immunity affords, allowing officials to operate without accountability or fear of repercussions.
Bob expresses a degree of pessimism regarding the bill’s prospects for adoption, recognizing the potential resistance from powerful governors who may feel threatened by the proposed changes. Nevertheless, he emphasizes the importance of initiating the legislative process regardless of anticipated obstacles. He posits that the public should be made aware of any obstruction by the governors against what many consider a necessary amendment for addressing corruption and promoting accountability in governance. By removing immunity while officials are in office, Bob believes that it would encourage them to act with greater integrity. He challenges the notion that actions should be delayed until after officials leave office, arguing that immediate accountability is essential for fostering ethical governance.
The discourse extends to the scope of the proposed changes concerning the president’s immunity. Bob clarifies that while he does not advocate for the complete removal of the president’s immunity, he does suggest that it should be limited to actions consistent with presidential duties. He argues that immunity should not extend to the vice president merely for holding the position and asserts that lower-tier officials, such as governors and deputy governors, do not require such legal protection. Bob draws attention to the extreme abuses that can occur due to the current immunity provision, underscoring a hypothetical scenario where a governor could commit serious crimes without facing legal consequences.
Despite the extensive support for this proposed legislation among parliament members, Bob acknowledges the reality that constitutional amendments in Nigeria require substantial backing from state assemblies. He recalls a past instance where an immunity proposal for lawmakers was quashed due to the potential dangers it introduced. Bob firmly rejects the idea of expanding immunity to lawmakers, arguing that Nigeria is already burdened with excessive absolute power among its leaders. Without accountability, he warns of the lawlessness that could ensue should immunity become more widespread.
Bob underscores the importance of timely justice, asserting that delays in prosecuting wrongdoers not only lead to the loss of evidence but also allow for potential corruption of witnesses. He argues that active accountability while individuals are still in power is crucial for justice, emphasizing the need to initiate legal action immediately upon infractions. The underlying premise is that allowing officials to complete their terms without consequence fosters an environment where corruption can thrive without fear of prosecution. He presents the argument that accountability must be a continuous process, rather than a deferred action contingent upon the end of a term.
The discussion culminates in Bob’s advocacy for a completely restructured constitution, arguing that mere amendments have become ritualistic and lack true reform. He calls for a comprehensive constitutional overhaul to address the structural inefficiencies and legal gaps within the current framework. Bob’s larger vision reflects a desire for systemic change, aiming for a governance structure that genuinely serves the Nigerian populace by fostering integrity, accountability, and effective leadership. Whether through amendments or a new constitution, his stance is clear: Nigeria needs a legal foundation that holds leaders accountable and facilitates justice.
