The Ghana School Feeding Programme (GSFP), an initiative designed to provide nutritious meals to school children across the country, has been thrown into disarray following the abrupt termination of contracts for all caterers involved in the program. This unexpected move by the Mahama administration on May 2, 2025, has left thousands of caterers in a precarious position, uncertain about their future and the livelihoods they depend on. While the government has assured them of eventual payment for outstanding arrears, the lack of a clear timeline for these payments and the complete absence of information regarding future contracts has created widespread anxiety and fueled a wave of protests among the affected caterers. This sudden termination has brought into sharp focus the vulnerability of caterers within the GSFP framework and the broader implications for the continuity of the program itself.
The caterers, represented by the National School Feeding Caterers Association, have expressed deep frustration and concern over the government’s handling of the situation. The lack of communication and the absence of a concrete plan for moving forward have left them feeling disregarded and undervalued. Madam Margaret Larbi, Deputy Public Relations Officer of the Association, articulated the caterers’ desperation, highlighting their reliance on the program for their income and the devastating impact this termination has had on their lives and families. The lack of transparency surrounding the decision has fueled speculation and distrust, leaving caterers with more questions than answers. They are now left grappling with the uncertainty of their future involvement in the program, raising questions about the long-term sustainability of the GSFP and its ability to fulfill its mandate of providing meals to school children.
In response to the government’s actions, the caterers have decided to pursue a multi-pronged approach to seek redress and reinstatement. Their strategy involves appealing to influential figures within Ghanaian society, including traditional and religious leaders, to mediate on their behalf and exert pressure on the government to reconsider its decision. This reflects the deep respect held for these leaders within Ghanaian society and their perceived ability to influence political decisions. The caterers are placing their hopes on these respected figures to intervene and facilitate a dialogue with the government, hoping for a resolution that safeguards their livelihoods and ensures the continuation of the school feeding program.
The decision to petition the Asantehene, Otumfuo Osei Tutu II, a revered traditional leader in Ghana, underscores the caterers’ belief in his authority and influence. They see him as a powerful advocate who can bridge the gap between the government and the affected caterers. Simultaneously, they are also seeking the support of the National Chief Imam, Osmanu Nuhu Sharubutu, a highly respected religious leader, further demonstrating their commitment to leveraging all available avenues for resolution. This strategic approach of appealing to both traditional and religious leaders highlights the caterers’ understanding of the power dynamics within Ghana and their determination to utilize all available means to achieve their objective.
The caterers’ plan to petition these influential figures represents a significant development in the ongoing saga surrounding the GSFP. It signifies the growing discontent among the caterers and their resolve to fight for their rights and livelihoods. By seeking the intervention of respected figures like the Asantehene and the National Chief Imam, the caterers aim to amplify their voices and exert pressure on the Mahama administration to address their concerns. This move also signals a potential shift in the dynamics of the situation, potentially bringing wider public attention to the plight of the caterers and the importance of the school feeding program.
The ongoing situation surrounding the GSFP highlights the complex challenges inherent in implementing social programs and the need for clear communication and transparent processes. The abrupt termination of caterers’ contracts without adequate explanation raises serious questions about the government’s management of the program and the potential impact on the vulnerable populations it serves. The caterers’ response, by seeking the intervention of influential figures, reflects the importance of community engagement and the role of traditional and religious leaders in mediating disputes and advocating for the rights of their constituents. The outcome of this situation will undoubtedly have significant implications for the future of the GSFP and the well-being of the children who depend on it.
