Senator Nwebonyi’s Call for Abuja Airport Environs Redevelopment and the Ensuing Debate
Senator Onyekachi Nwebonyi, representing Ebonyi North Senatorial District, ignited a debate during a plenary session by advocating for the redevelopment of the areas surrounding the Abuja International Airport. He expressed concerns about the current state of the infrastructure, arguing that the aging buildings and overall appearance create a negative first impression for visitors arriving in Nigeria. Nwebonyi emphasized the importance of aligning the airport’s surroundings with the ongoing infrastructural transformation within the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), spearheaded by Minister Nyesom Wike. He urged his colleagues to support budgetary allocations for either relocating existing communities or comprehensively renovating the area to enhance the nation’s image.
Senator Nwebonyi’s proposition sparked a disagreement with Senate President Godswill Akpabio, who questioned the rationale behind relocating communities based solely on aesthetic considerations. Akpabio argued that the image of a nation shouldn’t be solely defined by the view from an airplane during descent. He drew a comparison with his own state, Akwa Ibom, where the landscape predominantly features creeks and water bodies, highlighting the diverse natural features across the country. Akpabio’s counterargument emphasized the importance of recognizing and respecting the existing communities and their right to remain in their homes.
The ensuing debate reflected differing perspectives on urban development, national image, and community rights. Senator Nwebonyi’s position prioritized aesthetic improvements and aligning the airport’s surroundings with the broader infrastructural transformation of the FCT. His argument centered on the idea that the first impression upon arrival plays a crucial role in shaping perceptions of a nation. On the other hand, Senate President Akpabio emphasized the importance of considering the existing communities and their right to remain in their homes. He questioned the notion that a nation’s image should be solely determined by the view from an airplane and highlighted the diversity of landscapes across the country.
The Senate’s ultimate decision to reject Senator Nwebonyi’s proposal, through a voice vote, indicated the prevailing sentiment among the senators. This outcome suggests that a majority of senators prioritized the rights of the existing communities and potentially saw the proposed relocation as disruptive and unnecessary. The debate highlighted the complex balancing act between urban development goals and the rights of existing communities. While aesthetic improvements and infrastructure development can enhance a city’s image, they should be pursued in a manner that respects the rights and needs of the people who call those areas home.
This incident is not the first instance of Senator Nwebonyi being involved in a publicly noted exchange. Previously, during a hearing concerning sexual harassment allegations against Senator Akpabio and Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, Senator Nwebonyi clashed with Obi Ezekwesili, a former minister. The exchange began when Nwebonyi requested to make a submission, leading to a heated verbal altercation. Ezekwesili’s comment, telling the senator to "shut up," triggered an angry response from Nwebonyi, who questioned her conduct and called her an "insult to womanhood." This incident underscores the often-contentious nature of political discourse and the potential for heated exchanges, even within formal settings.
Senator Nwebonyi’s recent actions reflect a pattern of assertive engagement in public discourse, sometimes leading to confrontational exchanges. His advocacy for redevelopment around the Abuja airport demonstrates a willingness to raise potentially controversial issues and challenge existing norms. While his proposal ultimately failed to gain support, it sparked a valuable discussion about the balance between urban development and community rights. Similarly, his altercation with Obi Ezekwesili highlights the potential for heated exchanges within the political arena. These incidents collectively paint a picture of a senator who is unafraid to express his views, even if it leads to confrontation. This assertive approach, while potentially effective in raising awareness about certain issues, may also contribute to a more polarized and contentious political environment.
