The Electoral Commission (EC) of Ghana, under the leadership of Chairperson Jean Mensa, suspended the re-collation of parliamentary results for nine constituencies due to procedural breaches and threats against its staff. This decisive action was taken to safeguard the integrity of the electoral process and prevent further escalation of conflict with political parties. The affected constituencies included Dome Kwabenya, Okaikwei Central, Ablekuma North, Techiman South, Suhum, Akwatia, Fanteakwa North, Ahafo Ano North, and Tema Central. The initial collation process in these constituencies had encountered issues, necessitating a re-collation exercise. However, this subsequent process was marred by disruptions attributed to the interference of political party agents, prompting the EC to suspend the re-collation altogether.
The EC’s decision to halt the re-collation process was met with approval from security analyst Professor Kwesi Aning, who emphasized the importance of prioritizing electoral integrity. He argued that suspending the process was the most appropriate course of action, given the persistent high tensions surrounding the results. Professor Aning acknowledged the efforts of law enforcement agencies in controlling sporadic outbreaks of chaos and indiscipline. However, he also expressed concern over the EC’s criticism of election security, suggesting it raised questions about the preparedness and effectiveness of security agencies in safeguarding the electoral process.
The suspension of the re-collation process highlights the challenges faced by the EC in conducting a free, fair, and transparent election. The interference of political party agents not only disrupted the process but also undermined public trust in the integrity of the results. The EC’s decision to halt the process demonstrates its commitment to upholding the principles of fairness and transparency, even in the face of pressure and interference. It underscores the critical role of an independent and impartial electoral body in ensuring the credibility of democratic elections.
Professor Aning’s endorsement of the EC’s decision further emphasizes the gravity of the situation and the need for a comprehensive review of election security protocols. The incidents of interference and disruption during the re-collation process underscore the vulnerability of the electoral system to manipulation and undue influence. The concerns raised by the EC regarding election security necessitate a thorough assessment of the preparedness and capacity of security agencies to effectively protect the electoral process from external threats and internal interference.
The suspension of the re-collation process also raises broader questions about the role and responsibility of political parties in ensuring a peaceful and credible election. The actions of party agents in disrupting the process not only undermined the integrity of the results but also contributed to the heightened tensions and potential for conflict. Political parties have a crucial responsibility to promote peaceful participation in the electoral process and respect the authority of the EC. Their actions and rhetoric should contribute to a conducive environment for free and fair elections, rather than exacerbating tensions and undermining public trust.
Moving forward, it is essential for all stakeholders, including the EC, political parties, security agencies, and civil society organizations, to work collaboratively to strengthen the electoral process and prevent future occurrences of interference and disruption. This requires a comprehensive review of existing electoral laws and procedures, enhanced training for election officials and security personnel, and greater public awareness campaigns on the importance of peaceful and credible elections. The integrity of the electoral process is fundamental to the stability and legitimacy of any democracy, and all efforts must be made to protect it from undue influence and manipulation.
