The University of Professional Studies, Accra (UPSA), has categorically refuted claims of being served with a legal writ or an application for an interlocutory injunction concerning its recent investiture ceremony for the new Vice-Chancellor. This denial was formally communicated in a letter dated December 27th, penned by the university’s Registrar, Lorraine B. Gyan, and addressed to the Chancellor. The letter sought to clarify the situation following concerns raised by the Chancellor earlier the same day, which suggested the university had been legally restrained from proceeding with the ceremony. The Registrar’s letter unequivocally stated that the university had not received any formal legal documents or correspondence, including any application for an injunction, effectively debunking the circulating rumors.
The Registrar’s clarification provides a detailed account of the events leading up to the investiture ceremony and the university’s rationale for proceeding despite the circulating rumors. The letter highlights that the concerns raised by the Chancellor stemmed from media reports alleging the existence of a writ against the university. However, the university, having sought legal counsel during a recent Council meeting, determined that media reports alone, without a formal court order, did not constitute a legal impediment to the planned ceremony. This legal interpretation underpinned the university’s decision to proceed with the investiture as scheduled.
The UPSA, emphasizing adherence to the UPSA Act (Act 850), conducted the Oath of Office ceremony for the incoming Vice-Chancellor, with the Deputy Minister of Education, representing the President, administering the oath as stipulated by law. The Registrar’s letter not only clarifies the university’s legal standing but also underscores its commitment to due process and adherence to the established legal framework governing its operations. The letter further expresses regret at the Chancellor’s absence from the ceremony while reiterating that the event was conducted in full compliance with the UPSA Act.
The controversy surrounding the investiture ceremony appears to have stemmed from a misunderstanding fueled by media reports, which lacked the legal weight of an official court order. The university, acting on the advice of its legal counsel, determined that the absence of a formal injunction allowed it to proceed with the ceremony. This interpretation of the legal situation was crucial in the university’s decision-making process and ultimately led to the successful investiture of the new Vice-Chancellor. The incident highlights the importance of distinguishing between media reports and official legal documents in interpreting legal obligations.
The Registrar’s letter serves as a comprehensive response to the Chancellor’s concerns, providing a clear and detailed account of the university’s legal position and the rationale behind its actions. The letter emphasizes the university’s proactive approach in seeking legal counsel before proceeding with the ceremony, demonstrating a commitment to upholding the rule of law. Furthermore, the letter highlights the university’s adherence to the UPSA Act in conducting the investiture ceremony, reinforcing its commitment to operating within the established legal parameters.
In conclusion, the UPSA’s response to the alleged injunction effectively clarifies its legal standing and underscores its commitment to due process. The university, having consulted legal counsel and established the absence of a formal court order, proceeded with the investiture ceremony in accordance with the UPSA Act. The incident underscores the importance of verifying information and relying on official legal documents rather than media reports when interpreting legal obligations. The Registrar’s letter, addressed to the Chancellor, serves as a transparent and detailed account of the university’s actions, reinforcing its commitment to operating within the bounds of the law.
