Paragraph 1: Introduction & Mandate Clarification
The Anambra State Special Anti-Touting Squad (SASA), under the leadership of its Director of Operations, Chukwuebuka Onwuemene, has reaffirmed its unwavering dedication to eradicating illegal revenue collection and maintaining order across the state’s roads, parks, and markets. Onwuemene addressed recent criticisms and allegations, emphasizing that SASA operates within a clearly defined mandate. The agency’s primary focus is to curb illicit revenue collection, not to impede legitimate revenue streams authorized by the government. This distinction is crucial to understanding SASA’s operations and dispelling the misconception that all revenue collection activities are targeted.
Paragraph 2: Addressing Accusations of Bias and Selective Enforcement
Allegations of bias against SASA have emerged, suggesting that the agency favors certain illegal revenue collectors while targeting others. Onwuemene refuted these claims, attributing them to a misunderstanding of SASA’s role. He stressed the importance of verifying the legitimacy of any revenue collection activity before drawing conclusions. SASA aims to distinguish between legally authorized revenue collection and illegal extortion, focusing its efforts on dismantling networks of unauthorized collectors who exploit the public. Onwuemene called for public cooperation in identifying and reporting instances of illegal revenue collection to expedite SASA’s intervention.
Paragraph 3: Justifying Enforcement Measures and Responding to Allegations of Brutality
SASA’s operational methods, particularly the reported use of pestles during enforcement actions ("Aka Odo"), have drawn criticism and raised concerns about excessive force. Onwuemene defended the agency’s tactics, asserting that any measures taken are justified and necessary to maintain order and enforce the law. He argued that SASA’s interventions are targeted, based on evidence of illegal activity, and not arbitrary or indiscriminate. Furthermore, he suggested that many individuals alleging brutality have questionable backgrounds and may be attempting to discredit the agency.
Paragraph 4: Emphasizing Due Process and Investigative Procedures
Onwuemene underscored SASA’s commitment to following due process. He explained that the agency does not conduct random arrests or enter private residences without reasonable cause. Rather, actions taken by SASA are typically preceded by investigations into reported illegal revenue collection activities. Once evidence is established, the agency intervenes to apprehend the perpetrators and halt their illicit operations. This commitment to due process aims to protect the rights of individuals while effectively addressing unlawful activities.
Paragraph 5: Public Perception and Self-Assessment of Performance
Recognizing the importance of public perception, Onwuemene invited public scrutiny and evaluation of SASA’s performance. While acknowledging that self-assessment can be subjective, he expressed confidence in the agency’s effectiveness. He used the analogy of a strong tree standing by the roadside, subject to attacks from all sides, to describe the challenges SASA faces in its mission. Despite these challenges, he maintained that the agency remains steadfast in its commitment to fulfilling its mandate.
Paragraph 6: Conclusion and Reaffirmation of Commitment
In conclusion, SASA remains committed to combating illegal revenue collection and maintaining order in Anambra State. Onwuemene’s statements aimed to clarify the agency’s mandate, address public concerns about alleged bias and excessive force, and emphasize SASA’s adherence to due process. The agency recognizes the importance of public trust and invites scrutiny of its operations. Despite facing challenges and criticism, SASA stands firm in its resolve to eradicate illegal revenue collection and uphold the law, ultimately contributing to a safer and more orderly environment for the citizens of Anambra State.
