The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has officially addressed public concerns regarding the recently released results of the 2025 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME). Characterizing the complaints as “unusual” and originating primarily from a few states within the Federation, JAMB acknowledged the issues and emphasized its commitment to a thorough investigation and remediation. The board highlighted its ongoing annual system review, a comprehensive post-examination analysis covering all stages from registration to result release. This review, according to JAMB, serves as a critical mechanism for identifying and addressing any systemic or technical challenges that may have impacted the examination process.
Central to JAMB’s response is the commitment to fairness and ensuring every candidate has the opportunity to take the examination. The board reiterated its policy of rescheduling examinations for candidates affected by technical difficulties without hesitation. This commitment underscores the importance placed on providing a level playing field for all UTME candidates. JAMB’s statement further emphasizes the meticulous scrutiny being applied to the received complaints, seeking to pinpoint the root causes of the reported irregularities. This detailed analysis includes collaborations with a diverse team of experts, encompassing representatives from the Computer Professionals Association of Nigeria, Chief External Examiners from tertiary institutions, educational assessment specialists, and university Vice Chancellors.
The inclusion of these external experts highlights JAMB’s commitment to transparency and a comprehensive evaluation of the examination process. This multi-faceted approach aims to provide an objective and independent assessment of any potential technical glitches or systemic issues. JAMB’s spokesperson, Fabian Benjamin, assured the public that appropriate remedial measures will be implemented promptly if the investigation identifies any shortcomings. This proactive approach mirrors the board’s handling of examination-day technical challenges, demonstrating a consistent commitment to resolving issues efficiently and effectively.
The detailed system review underscores JAMB’s dedication to continuous improvement and accountability. The process offers a structured framework for evaluating every stage of the examination, allowing for targeted interventions to address any identified weaknesses. This commitment to ongoing evaluation reinforces the board’s aim to ensure the integrity and reliability of the UTME as a crucial gateway to tertiary education. The engagement of external experts, including IT professionals, academics, and assessment specialists, further solidifies the comprehensive nature of the review.
JAMB’s response can be seen as a demonstration of its responsiveness to public concerns and its dedication to upholding the integrity of the UTME. By promptly acknowledging the complaints and initiating a thorough investigation, the board is taking concrete steps to address the issues raised. Furthermore, the involvement of external experts and the commitment to implementing remedial measures highlight JAMB’s proactive approach to resolving challenges and ensuring the fairness of the examination process. This transparent approach builds public trust and demonstrates a commitment to continuous improvement in the administration of the UTME.
The board’s ongoing system review and its responsiveness to public concerns are essential components of maintaining a credible and reliable UTME process. The comprehensive analysis, coupled with the expertise brought in through external collaborators, ensures a thorough evaluation of the examination from registration to result release. By addressing identified issues and implementing remedial measures, JAMB reinforces its commitment to providing a fair and equitable platform for all candidates seeking admission to tertiary institutions. This commitment to continuous improvement is crucial for upholding the integrity of the UTME and maintaining public confidence in the examination as a vital pathway to higher education.
