Hon. Alexander Afenyo-Markin, the Majority Leader and Leader of Government Business in Parliament, has issued a pointed response to claims from the Minority Leader, Hon. Cassiel Ato Forson. In a recent press statement, Afenyo-Markin addressed the Minority’s insistence on having the Majority in Parliament and stressed the significance of adhering to the rule of law and respecting judicial processes. His remarks serve as a direct challenge to the National Democratic Congress (NDC) Minority, encouraging them to pursue their claims through the legal avenues available. Afenyo-Markin highlighted that if the Minority believes they have solid arguments to present to the Supreme Court, they are welcome to engage competent legal representation. However, he firmly asserted that they cannot selectively respect court rulings, stating, “That’s not how democracy functions.”
The context of this debate stems from a recent Supreme Court ruling that suspended a parliamentary decision which had declared four seats vacant. This ruling altered the balance of power in Parliament, favoring the NDC caucus as the Majority. Afenyo-Markin quickly pointed out that any shifts in parliamentary power must be addressed strictly within the framework of the law, advising that the Minority should respect such judicial decisions. He articulated that while he understands the Minority’s eagerness to assert an alleged new Majority status, the principle of rule of law is fundamental to democratic governance. He reaffirmed the importance of operating within a legal framework dictated not only by the Constitution but also by a respect for Supreme Court rulings — the final authority on constitutional interpretations.
Afenyo-Markin, drawing from his extensive background in law, underscored the necessity of acknowledging court decisions regardless of their outcomes. He acknowledged the emotional weight of losing a legal battle but emphasized that when one believes in the righteousness of their cause, they should pursue appeals all the way to the Supreme Court. He reflected on his personal experiences, having both won and lost numerous appeals, and reiterated that ultimately, it is the law and the Constitution that prevail in the end. His perspective highlights the complexity of legal battles while maintaining a firm stance on the supremacy of the judicial system.
In his statement, Afenyo-Markin assured that the New Patriotic Party (NPP) Caucus is dedicated to upholding the Constitution, adhering to the rule of law, and prioritizing the interests of all Ghanaians. He called on all parties involved in the ongoing discourse to maintain similar commitments to constitutional integrity and to respect democratic processes. By framing his argument in this manner, Afenyo-Markin reflects a desire for civil discourse and cooperation in the political arena, emphasizing that the stability of their democratic institutions is paramount.
Moreover, Afenyo-Markin’s insistence on observing due process not only reveals the dynamics between the ruling party and the opposition but also emphasizes the critical role of the judiciary in maintaining parliamentary equilibrium. His statements serve as a reminder that tensions within Parliament must be resolved in accordance with legal standards and institutional respect, minimizing any potential for chaos or disorder. The reference to the Supreme Court as the ultimate arbiter reinforces the boundaries of parliamentary actions and highlights the significance of adhering to lawful governance.
In conclusion, Afenyo-Markin’s statements reflect profound implications for the political landscape in Ghana, particularly regarding the operations of Parliament and the relationship between legal frameworks and democratic practices. By reinforcing the principles of the rule of law and respect for judiciary decisions, Afenyo-Markin not only defends his party’s stance but also asserts the necessity for all political entities to function within the legal confines established by the Constitution. His appeals for unity and adherence to the rule of law serve as both a challenge to the Minority and an invitation for all stakeholders to prioritize the integrity of the democratic institutions that underpin the nation’s governance.
